What To Do About the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund?
September 30, 2016 – Why has spending from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund not kept pace with tax receipts, and what can be done to remedy the situation?
If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
By Jeff Davis
September 30, 2016 – Why has spending from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund not kept pace with tax receipts, and what can be done to remedy the situation?
Unanimous opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court delivered March 31, 1998 declaring that the Harbor Maintenance Tax is indeed a tax and not a user fee and is thus unconstitutional when applied to exports.
Summaries, links to final amendment text, and disposition of all amendments made in order to H.R. 5303, the Water Resources Development Act, during consideration on the House floor in September 2016. Current as of the…
By Jeff Davis
Oops! It looks like you’ve found some member-only content. To access this resource, please log in as an Eno member.
If you’re not a member yet, explore the benefits of joining us – we’d love to have you onboard!
September 22, 2016 – This November, the power of the state and local governments in the American electoral process will be forcefully demonstrated. But in addition to the presidential drama, another election story, with dramatic lessons about state and local influence, will play out as Americans in nearly half the states vote on important questions related to transportation investments in their regions.
By Jeff Davis
Oops! It looks like you’ve found some member-only content. To access this resource, please log in as an Eno member.
If you’re not a member yet, explore the benefits of joining us – we’d love to have you onboard!
By Greg Rogers
Oops! It looks like you’ve found some member-only content. To access this resource, please log in as an Eno member.
If you’re not a member yet, explore the benefits of joining us – we’d love to have you onboard!
This is a list of the changes made by the Inhofe-Boxer manager’s amendment (S. Amdt. #5042) to the amendment in the nature of a substitute (S. Amdt. #4979) to S. 2848, the Water Resources Development…
Text of Inhofe-Boxer manager’s amendment (S. Amdt. #5042) to the amendment in the nature of a substitute (S. Amdt. #4979) to S. 2848, the Water Resources Development Act of 2016. Offered on September 12, 2016….
By Jeff Davis
Oops! It looks like you’ve found some member-only content. To access this resource, please log in as an Eno member.
If you’re not a member yet, explore the benefits of joining us – we’d love to have you onboard!
Section-by-section summary of the Inhofe-Boxer amendment in the nature of a substitute to S. 2848, the Water Resources Development Act of 2016.
Summary of the changes made in the reported version of S. 2848, the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, by the proposed Inhofe-Boxer amendment in the nature of a substitute proposed in September 2016.
Eno is an independent, non-partisan think-tank that shapes public debate on critical multimodal transportation issues and builds an innovative network of transportation professionals.
1629 K Street NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20006
P: 202.879.4700