What, Exactly, Did President Trump Just Say About Gateway?

What, Exactly, Did President Trump Just Say About Gateway?

February 08, 2019  | Jeff Davis

February 8, 2019

Two days ago, President Trump gave an interview to a group of selected local journalists from around the U.S. Newsday, the Long Island newspaper, asked Trump about the Gateway program of passenger rail projects between New York and New Jersey. Newsday reports that Trump said “We have the money set aside but … we haven’t decided to use it yet. I’m speaking to the governor  [Andrew M. Cuomo]. I’m speaking with various senators, and we’ll see what happens.

The article, by Newsday’s Laura Figueroa Hernandez, then goes on to say:

On Wednesday, Trump said “I’m open-minded” about the project that Cuomo, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and New Jersey officials have been pressing him to fund at the levels agreed to by the Obama administration.

The president dismissed reports claiming he is withholding funding as leverage to garner support from Schumer and congressional Democrats for his $5.7 billion southern border wall request.

“We have to see what they’re doing. It’s a very expensive project, very expensive, so we have to see what they’re doing, it’s got to be approved by us,” Trump said.

Could the money for the project really be “set aside” already?

Not the way that New York and New Jersey have proposed to fund the project, it isn’t. Caveat: too many people use the word “Gateway” (a $30+ billion program of projects across NYC and NJ) with the proposed new Hudson River Tunnel (the $11+ billion centerpiece project of the Gateway Program, but only one project amongst many). From the context of the article, it appears they were talking solely about the tunnel.

New York and New Jersey have proposed to fund the Hudson River Tunnel through the Federal Transit Administration’s budget, even though the current tunnel is owned and operated by Amtrak and the new tunnel would also be operated by Amtrak, and Amtrak gets its federal subsidy funding through the Federal Railroad Administration, not FTA.

The particular FTA program they have identified to fund the tunnel is the Capital Investment Grant program, which gets annual discretionary appropriations (meaning there is no such thing as multi-year guaranteed money, legally speaking).

ETW did a write-up of the CIG program in late November 2018 that listed all the pending projects and appropriations they have either received or will need. At the time, the program had $1.4 billion in appropriations that had not yet been allocated to a particular ongoing project. Annual appropriations have been running about $2.5 billion per year.

But New York and New Jersey are asking for a massive $6.7 billion allocation for the Hudson River Tunnel, which represents every unallocated dime the program currently has plus every dime they are going to get in the FY 2019 appropriations bill and probably FY 2020 as well (if you were able to shut down every other subway construction project in the country and just give the money to the Hudson River Tunnel, which of course you can’t do). So there is certainly no way that any existing appropriations approaching the ballpark of the cost of the new tunnel can be considered to have been set aside.

Also, the tunnel is currently ineligible, by law, to receive any CIG appropriations. The CIG statute in 49 U.S.C. §5309 requires that the Secretary of Transportation rate every potential project on a five-point scale, and that the average has to be at least “medium” (3 on the 1 to 5 scale) in order to be eligible for appropriations and a grant agreement. The current rating for the tunnel project (set in November 2017) is “medium-low,” and the Secretary would have to upgrade that rating to allow any money to be spent.

Share

Related Articles

FRA Establishes CIG-Like

FRA Establishes CIG-Like "Pipeline" for Intercity Rail Corridors

Last Friday, the Federal Railroad Administration published a notice establishing a program to provide periodic evaluation of potential...

New Amtrak Nominees May Overbalance Board Towards Northeast Corridor

New Amtrak Nominees May Overbalance Board Towards Northeast Corridor

When the White House announced a slate of new nominees for the Amtrak Board of Directors at 3 p.m. last Friday, it was not clear who each...

Biden to Nominate 5 Amtrak Board Members

Biden to Nominate 5 Amtrak Board Members

In a 3 p.m. Friday afternoon announcement, the White House sent out a news release stating that President Biden intends to nominate five...

Amtrak's FY23 Budget Adheres to IIJA Authorizations

Amtrak's FY23 Budget Adheres to IIJA Authorizations

Amtrak has released its own request for federal appropriations for fiscal year 2023, separate from the request submitted on Amtrak's behalf...

Amtrak Concedes Perpetual $1 Billion/Year Operating Losses

Amtrak Concedes Perpetual $1 Billion/Year Operating Losses

What a difference two years makes. In fiscal 2019, Amtrak only lost $29 million on operations, and the budget estimates submitted to...

T&I Hearing Looks at Expanded Intercity Passenger Rail

T&I Hearing Looks at Expanded Intercity Passenger Rail

On Thursday, December 9, the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials Subcommittee...

Op-Ed: Recognizing the Reasons for Railroad Deaths

Op-Ed: Recognizing the Reasons for Railroad Deaths

While we do not yet know the precise cause of the recent Amtrak derailment in Montana, the response was swift. The National Transportation...

Train derailments like the Montana incident are rare, but other railroad-related deaths are on the rise

Train derailments like the Montana incident are rare, but other railroad-related deaths are on the rise

“The response that we’re seeing to the Montana crash is showing that the existing standards that we have are in some respects working....

Safer Railroading: A Guide Toward Targeted Safety Policy

Safer Railroading: A Guide Toward Targeted Safety Policy

Railroads are among the safest modes of transportation for workers, riders, and the public. Strong federal standards for railroad track and...

Webinar: Safer Railroading: A Discussion About Targeted Safety Policy

Webinar: Safer Railroading: A Discussion About Targeted Safety Policy

This webinar discusses the findings from Eno's report: Safer Railroading: A Guide Toward Targeted Safety Policy. According to Eno's...

A big bet on Amtrak

A big bet on Amtrak

That's "way more than any other" transportation secretary has ever been given, said Jeff Davis of the Eno Center for...

The infrastructure bill is more about maintaining train service than upgrading it

The infrastructure bill is more about maintaining train service than upgrading it

"Amtrak was set up to fail," Robert Puentes, CEO of the Eno Center for Transportation told CNN Business. "It wasn't designed to last as...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks