The Perils of Flat Funding

The Perils of Flat Funding

September 01, 2015  | ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION

In the weeks leading up to the federal surface transportation vote on a short-term extension, a few members of Congress started touting that we will have a five-year bill soon. But it comes with a caveat: flat-funding for roads, bridges and transit systems.

It is not news that our current funding levels are not meeting the needs of our nation’s economy, and creating a long backlog of projects. The deficiencies of our underinvestment are evident in the low “D” grades given to both roads and transit and “C+” grade for bridges in ASCE’s 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure.  In 2011, the American Society of Civil Engineers released an economic analysis with EDR Group that looked at what our continual underinvestment in highways, bridges, railroads and transit systems would mean for the nation’s economy by 2020.

The findings were alarming four years ago when ASCE released the report. Now, as we look to a five-year bill with no increase in federal investment, it’s about to become a reality.

This Failure to Act report revealed the following ripple effects if we continue status-quo investment levels and allow the further deterioration of U.S. surface transportation infrastructure amid deferred maintenance:

– The cost of unreliable transportation infrastructure to businesses will reduce the productivity and competitiveness of American firms relative to global competitors. Cumulative costs will reach $430 billion by 2020. To compensate for these increased costs, businesses will have to divert increasing portions of earned income to pay for transportation delays and vehicle repairs, draining money that would otherwise be invested in innovation and expansion.

– Households will be forced to forgo discretionary purchases, reduce health related purchases along with other expenditures that affect quality of life, in order to pay transportation costs that could be avoided if infrastructure were built to sufficient levels. These increased cumulative costs to households equates to $1,060 less for discretionary spending every year until at least 2020. From 2011 to this year, it has cost your personal budget $5,300. If the status-quo continues for the next five years, it will cost you another $5,300.

– The U.S. will lose jobs in high value, high paying services and manufacturing industries as we struggle to remain competitive. The only sectors seeing gains would relate to auto services.

– Overall job losses of more than 876,000 in the year 2020 are mitigated by more people working for less money and less productively due to the diminished effectiveness of the U.S. surface transportation system, meaning 234,000 jobs will only exist if many more workers agree to pay cuts.

– America’s gross domestic product will underperform by $897 billion because of a decrease in exports due to deficient transportation networks. Exports will drop in 79 of 93 different tradable commodities, totaling a $28 billion loss.

There is a lot at stake in the Highway Trust Fund battle, and as the past year has shown us, a multi-year bill will take political courage and cost some political capital on both sides of the aisle. To go through that struggle and come out the other side with a bill that does not grow the program is a waste of energy and hand-wringing. The recent trend of short-term extensions bought by budget gimmicks are all because Congress continues to ignore the most direct route for raising revenue: increasing the gas tax to recoup its 1993 purchasing power.

We are stealing from the future two-fold if we do not raise the gas tax (or identify another long-term sustainable source of revenue) to increase investment in transportation. First, these gimmicks mean that Congress is adding to the national debt. Second, shortchanging our transportation system is literally stifling our nation’s economic growth.

If Congress were to raise the gas tax by at least 20 cents, it would cost on average $187 more per year per motorist. In contrast, right now each motorist is paying $516 a year in additional repairs and operating costs. In addition, Americans spend an average of 34 hours a year stuck in traffic, costing the U.S. economy $101 billion in wasted fuel and lost time annually. It’s a savings for your wallet by staying out of the auto mechanic shop. It’s an even bigger savings as it protects that $1,060 mentioned above.

In contrast to underinvestment, the 2013 Report Card also showed the benefits of increased funding for bridges. The number of structurally deficient bridges decreased from 2009 to 2013, as did the average age of bridges, thanks to increased investment. Because of these improvements, the grade went up from a “C” to a “C+.”  That’s the kind of positive trends we see when we prioritize investment. If we do not, we are at risk of backsliding on these recent successes along with harming our economic competitiveness.

Ultimately, the decision of how to find the revenue to fund a five or six-year bill is the job of Congress. But as they devise a deal that can get through both the House and Senate, they have an onus to devise a bill that supports economic growth.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Eno Center for Transportation.

Share

Related Articles

FHWA Solicits Applications for $2.4B in Bridge Project Funding

FHWA Solicits Applications for $2.4B in Bridge Project Funding

This morning, the Federal Highway Administration opened the process of giving out the first $2.36 billion of a five-year, $12+ billion...

Bridge Collapse Revives Criticism Over Using Road Dollars for Police

Bridge Collapse Revives Criticism Over Using Road Dollars for Police

Jeff Davis, a senior fellow with the Eno Center for Transportation and the editor of the Eno Transportation Weekly, said that...

FHWA Gives States $5.3 Billion in Bridge Funding

FHWA Gives States $5.3 Billion in Bridge Funding

The Federal Highway Administration today gave state DOTs $5.3 billion in new funding specifically to repair and improve highway bridges,...

Biden Plan Funds New Bridges That Locals May Not Want

Biden Plan Funds New Bridges That Locals May Not Want

“The bigger you get, whether it’s a bridge or a tunnel, the more trouble you’re going to get,” said Jeff Davis, a senior fellow at...

Can Biden build a bridge to fix America's infrastructure problems?

Can Biden build a bridge to fix America's infrastructure problems?

Designed to support state-level transportation projects, Paul Lewis, vice president of policy at Eno Center for Transportation, said states...

The repair of a vital Memphis bridge could take 2 months, chief engineer says. The impacts are already being felt

The repair of a vital Memphis bridge could take 2 months, chief engineer says. The impacts are already being felt

"A bridge like this could likely qualify, but it's hard to say what the metrics will be," said Paul Lewis, vice president of policy and...

Can Congress fix I-80? How Biden’s expected infrastructure plan could impact Sacramento

Can Congress fix I-80? How Biden’s expected infrastructure plan could impact Sacramento

Saying a bridge is deficient “doesn’t mean the bridge is about to fall down. That kind of thing is very rare. Things that engineers do...

Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

Perhaps we are still distracted by the election. Perhaps commuting patterns have changed so much that it is not as important. But unless...

Rapid Response Webinar: The House Surface Transportation Bill: Initial Overview

Rapid Response Webinar: The House Surface Transportation Bill: Initial Overview

Eno’s Jeff Davis summarizes the funding levels and major programmatic changes under the $490 billion surface transportation authorization...

FHWA Gives Out $2B in FY20 General Fund Highway Formula Funding

FHWA Gives Out $2B in FY20 General Fund Highway Formula Funding

The Federal Highway Administration has apportioned to states the $2 billion in additional highway formula funding from general revenues...

Performance Goals Force Some States to Prioritize NHS Bridges, Interstate Maintenance

Performance Goals Force Some States to Prioritize NHS Bridges, Interstate Maintenance

As the Eno Center's recent study, Refreshing the Status Quo: Federal Highway Programs and Funding Distribution pointed out, at present, the...

DOT Gives $225M in Grants for One-Off Discretionary Bridge Program

DOT Gives $225M in Grants for One-Off Discretionary Bridge Program

The U.S. Department of Transportation on August 29 announced that 20 highway bridge replacement projects would split $225 million in grant...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks