Scenario Planning for Automated Vehicles

Scenario Planning for Automated Vehicles

November 09, 2017  | Robert Puentes

In region after region, a growing chorus of leaders are calling for their city and metropolitan area to plan for a future of automated vehicles (AVs). Often these calls fall along a binary argument between what analysts call the “heaven’ and ‘hell’ scenarios (or ‘utopia’ or ‘dystopia’ visions) for AVs.

In the Heaven scenario, AVs a are parts of shared fleets of vehicles that travelers don’t own but use like we see today in some car and bike programs. There would be fewer parking lots and roadways since AVs use the infrastructure more efficiently and that land could be repurposed for other uses like recreation. Traffic congestion would be reduced and regional economies would prosper. In the Hell scenario, AVs would be individually owned, with private vehicles driving up vehicle miles travelled and emitting greater carbon emissions. Roadways would become parking lots as these private vehicles clog up streets and infrastructure would decline. Millions of jobs would be lost to automation.

While advocates on both sides like to set it all up as an either/or situation, the reality is that no one know for sure what the impact on AVs the built environment will be. Yet all over the country – and world – governments are under pressure to craft regulations to plan for a future that is difficult to forecast. Their predicament: how to develop ways to define how they grow, instead of being defined by it.

Fortunately, regions still have the ability to act proactively to craft the kind of future they want.

The approach comes from work pioneered in places like Minneapolis and San Diego a few years ago. The idea is to specifically connect metropolitan growth with transportation investments by examining land use patterns, density and urban form to find innovative solutions to challenges like housing, like carbon emissions, agricultural preservation, and economic development. These scenario planning tools enable practitioners to effectively plan for a range of changes and uncertainties through decision making processes that not only consider what is likely to happen but also, what communities want to happen in the future.

In Sacramento, for example, the region devised alternatives to current transportation investment priorities and land use patterns in order to get what it wanted: to increase travel options, shorten commutes, improve air quality, and provide for housing choices that more closely align with the needs of an aging population. This broad vision—the result of scenario planning with local officials and the general public—is intended to guide land-use and transportation choices over the next 50 years.

In Salt Lake City, Envision Utah is a public-private partnership that promotes sustainable growth in Utah’s Greater Wasatch Area through their Quality Growth Strategy. The strategy is a collection of six interconnected and intentional goals, including the promotion of transportation choices alongside the provision of housing choices at all income levels, and 32 strategies to meet these goals. One of the primary tools to inform those goals and strategies was the application of a scenario plan, which extrapolated past development trends to uncover what the region would look like if growth went unchecked.

New attention to these sophisticated tools is due to new provisions that are contained in 2012’s federal transportation law, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). That law gave a big push for these tools in the move towards a more performance-based planning and the federal highway administration has just released a helpful guidebook to help regions understand how scenario planning can be a useful and effective tool in their transportation planning processes.

Regions should consider this guidebook and the new scenario planning practices as an indispensable tool as they wrestle with the uncertain future ushered in by AVs. Because while there is a lot we do not know, we do know regions cannot address tomorrow’s challenges with yesterday’s solutions. Now they have new tools.

Share

Related Articles

Webinar: Planning for People: The History and Future of Inclusive Transit Planning

Webinar: Planning for People: The History and Future of Inclusive Transit Planning

Who was transit built for? For what purpose? And how has that approach changed? Join Eno for a webinar that will answer these questions and...

Pivoting from Mobility on Demand to Food Delivery: Lessons from the MOD Pilot in Los Angeles

Pivoting from Mobility on Demand to Food Delivery: Lessons from the MOD Pilot in Los Angeles

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted transit agencies across the country to quickly modify service, protect the health of passengers and drivers,...

Webinar: What is next for MOD: Lessons from Los Angeles’ MOD Pilot During COVID

Webinar: What is next for MOD: Lessons from Los Angeles’ MOD Pilot During COVID

In January 2019, LA Metro launched a first-mile, last-mile mobility on demand (MOD) pilot with Via, offering shared rides to and from...

Guest Op-Ed: The Rise of Delivery as a Service

Guest Op-Ed: The Rise of Delivery as a Service

Everyday life entirely changed for most when the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. Out...

Infrastructure measure includes fund to ensure nation’s transit stations are accessible

Infrastructure measure includes fund to ensure nation’s transit stations are accessible

Lawmakers have tucked a dozen or so similar funds into the package, according to an analysis by Jeff Davis, a senior fellow at the Eno...

Eno Releases New Mobility on Demand Reports with Data Insights and Recommendations

Eno Releases New Mobility on Demand Reports with Data Insights and Recommendations

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, public transit in the United States was going through a very dynamic period. The FTA's MOD Sandbox...

Mobility on Demand in the Puget Sound Region: Evaluation of the Use and Performance of the MOD Pilot

Mobility on Demand in the Puget Sound Region: Evaluation of the Use and Performance of the MOD Pilot

Mobility on Demand in the Puget Sound Region is part of our research report series examining the FTA Sandbox Program in the Los Angeles and...

Mobility on Demand in the Los Angeles Region: Evaluation of the Use and Performance of the MOD Pilot

Mobility on Demand in the Los Angeles Region: Evaluation of the Use and Performance of the MOD Pilot

Mobility on Demand in the Los Angeles Region is part of our research report series examining the FTA Sandbox Program in the Los Angeles and...

Mobility Lessons Learned: A Summary of the MOD Pilots in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions

Mobility Lessons Learned: A Summary of the MOD Pilots in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions

Mobility Lessons Learned is our summary paper in our research report series examining the Case Study in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound...

Webinar: Lessons Learned from the Mobility on Demand Pilots in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions

Webinar: Lessons Learned from the Mobility on Demand Pilots in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, King County Metro, and Sound Transit have been piloting mobility on demand (MOD)...

Webinar: Improving Access for All: Bringing On-Demand Technology to Paratransit

Webinar: Improving Access for All: Bringing On-Demand Technology to Paratransit

This webinar offers one AICP Certification Maintenance credit. Click here for instructions on how to submit this event for credits via...

Webinar: Toward Universal Access

Webinar: Toward Universal Access

This webinar is an overview of Toward Universal Access: A Case Study in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions, which is the fourth paper...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks