Point/Counterpoint: 5G or DSRC for Connected Vehicle Technology

Point/Counterpoint: 5G or DSRC for Connected Vehicle Technology

September 14, 2018  | Paul Lewis

Connected vehicles (CVs) use wireless signals to communicate with other vehicles (V2V) and with infrastructure (V2I) to relay and process important information about speed, trajectory, and roadway conditions. The vehicles can use the information to help avoid crashes, navigate around congestion, and smooth traffic. Eventually, CVs promise to help make automated vehicle technology more efficient and safer.

The CV policy debate is how to connect them. For years governments have developed standards and deployed pilots for dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) that permit two-way medium-range wireless connectivity similar to WiFi. Since then, cellular 5G technology has advanced to the point where some transportation professionals are advocating 5G instead for connectivity.

Vehicle connectivity has the most benefit if all vehicles operate on the same standard and use the same base technology. Governments are poised to invest billions in V2I technology that will remain for decades. In Eno’s 2017 Beyond Speculation report, we recommend that the federal government reserve the current spectrum DSRC, and continue to test and pilot different CV technologies. Has the technology reached a point where policymakers can proceed with one over another? Is sharing the spectrum, currently reserved for DSRC, between both technologies a viable option?

This week, we have two perspectives from professionals representing leading global automobile manufacturers that have taken two different approaches to connected vehicle tech.

Hilary Cain is the Director of Technology and Innovation for Toyota, handling policy issues related to connected and automated vehicle technology. She writes that DSRC is best suited for collision avoidance and other safety applications.

Jessica Nigro is the General Manager of Technology and Innovation Policy at Daimler North America, driving the company’s policy efforts on innovation and future technology. Her op-ed says policymakers should prioritize 5G cellular technology for V2X connectivity, and share the 5.9 GHz band for niche DSRC applications.

Share

Related Articles

Webinar: The New Mobilities: Smart Planning for Emerging Transportation Technologies

Webinar: The New Mobilities: Smart Planning for Emerging Transportation Technologies

New transportation technologies are coming online faster than ever. While many of these emerging technologies are helping to expand our...

Congressional Hearing Discusses Promises and Perils of Automated Vehicles

Congressional Hearing Discusses Promises and Perils of Automated Vehicles

On May 18, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce’s Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce held a hearing on "Promises and...

Guest Op-Ed: The Current State of Public Policy for Autonomous Trucking

Guest Op-Ed: The Current State of Public Policy for Autonomous Trucking

The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) has long advocated for the benefits autonomous vehicles can bring to the nation’s...

Senate Commerce Looks at AV Development, but Pulls Bill from Schedule

Senate Commerce Looks at AV Development, but Pulls Bill from Schedule

This week, a Senate committee hearing looked at autonomous vehicle (AV) safety regulation, but the committee then postponed debate on AV...

Research on Low Speed Automated Vehicles Demonstrates Their Limitations and Potential

Research on Low Speed Automated Vehicles Demonstrates Their Limitations and Potential

During the final week of the Transportation Research Board’s annual meeting, the Transit Cooperative Research Program released...

Webinar: How Automated Delivery Could Shape the Future of Local Commerce

Webinar: How Automated Delivery Could Shape the Future of Local Commerce

COVID-19 has highlighted both the value of home delivery and contactless service. Automated vehicles (AV) could potentially enable both....

Guest Op-Ed: It Turns Out, Humans Are Pretty Smart: Developing Self-Driving Cars Is Harder Than We Thought

Guest Op-Ed: It Turns Out, Humans Are Pretty Smart: Developing Self-Driving Cars Is Harder Than We Thought

Self-driving cars. We’ve been promised for years they were “coming soon.” Most estimates a decade ago thought self-driving cars would...

Webinar: Automated Vehicle Technology, Public Policy, and BMW's Level 3 AV System

Webinar: Automated Vehicle Technology, Public Policy, and BMW's Level 3 AV System

While much of the transportation-related news has been focused on COVID-19 recovery, automated vehicle technologies are quietly progressing...

New Automated Vehicle Safety Self-Assessment from BMW Reveals AV Technology Progress, Policy Gaps

New Automated Vehicle Safety Self-Assessment from BMW Reveals AV Technology Progress, Policy Gaps

Last week BMW quietly released a new Voluntary Safety Self-Assessment (VSSA), which was posted to the National Highway Traffic Safety...

House Tees Up Revamp of an Automated Vehicle Bill

House Tees Up Revamp of an Automated Vehicle Bill

On Tuesday, February 11, the House Committee on Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection & Commerce held a hearing on...

Administration Releases AV 4.0 Document

Administration Releases AV 4.0 Document

The Trump Administration today released the fourth iteration of a federal government policy statement on automated vehicles (AVs). The...

Senate Committee Looks at Federal Roles in AV Safety

Senate Committee Looks at Federal Roles in AV Safety

On Wednesday, November 20, the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee held a hearing on the safety of highly automated...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks