Op-Ed: Why Automated Driving Faces a Monster Uphill Battle

Op-Ed: Why Automated Driving Faces a Monster Uphill Battle

September 17, 2021  | Paul Lewis

My three-year-old daughter takes her friend’s power wheels car for a first-time spin. I briefly show her how to turn the steering wheel and where the pedal is to move the car move forward. Within a few minutes, she has it down. She successfully navigates around sidewalk lamp posts, pauses for passers-by, and finds the horn. It strikes me: humans are good at driving.* This suggests that developing a successful fully automated vehicle is going to be really difficult, with ramifications for the public policies that support safer roads.

Let’s start with how humans are good at driving. Driving a vehicle is rather intuitive, like walking or running, only you control your speed and steering differently. Walking is a physical and social skill that has evolved in humans and other animals for millions of years. Our brains are designed to understand how to navigate, how to avoid or deal with unfamiliar objects in our paths, how to maneuver in crowds full of people. Driving is similar, and our brains are adept at picking it up. Give a teenager the keys to a 4,000-pound piece of machinery and most can learn to operate it in an afternoon.

Per the asterisk, (*) just because humans are naturally good at driving does not mean that it is safe. 39,000 people are killed in the United States by drivers ever year with many thousands more are injured. But this is because we put humans in situations that far exceed our brains’ capacities for making smart decisions. 70 mile per hour speed limits. 20 lane freeways with merging and exits. Bars located on two-lane rural roads. Hostile environments for walkers and bikers trying to get to where they need to go. Vehicles with limited visibility.

Safety is one of the most alluring potential attributes of automated driving. Theoretically, programming a car to follow the set rules of the road and anticipate future moves is something a computer is designed to do. Computers can have dozens of image sensors, can review the environment multiple times per second, do not get distracted or tired.

Computers are impressive to humans because we watch them do tasks that the human brain is not capable of doing. It takes hundreds of hours of practice and studying for a human to become an average chess player. But computers have been able to beat the world’s best human chess players since the 1990s and have grown powerful enough to easily win other games that are challenging to humans like Jeopardy or Go. We as humans are impressed by the capacity for a computer to think hundreds of moves ahead and calculate all possible outcomes.

But we far underestimate and undervalue the impressiveness of our own social and navigation skills. Take for example, a waiter in a crowded bar. You order a round of tall beers for you and your five best friends. The waiter fills the six glasses, balances them on a tray in one hand, and navigates a slippery floor in a dimly lit room while knowing how to avoid drunken groups of revelers, not split between two people who are taking, and bring the drinks to you without spilling anything. Society undervalues this skill in part by setting the wage floor below minimum wage, hoping they make up the difference in tips.

Ultimately driving is much more like carrying a tray of drinks than it is playing chess. We need to appreciate the fact that driving is based on social and navigational skills that humans are adept at after millions of years of evolution. We need to recognize that driving is not as simple as making the rules of the road into an algorithm and training artificial intelligence on edge cases.

What does this all mean for automated vehicles and road safety?

The current plateau of progress on vehicle automation is already resetting expectations. The fact that the way computers are wired means they simply cannot adopt the complex, socially oriented skills that are innate in humans. This means dim prospects for automated driving in the uncontrolled by common roadway environments that include weather events, pedestrians, bicyclists, and other human drivers who don’t always follow the rules. In the near and medium term, partial automation can help assist drivers avoid certain crashes and full automation might be best suited for highly controlled situations.

Years of more intensive testing might yet yield an automated driving system that can be trusted in the wild. I sincerely hope that full automation arrives in meaningful form one day, and we should certainly prepare our policies to accept it when it does.

In the meantime, we need to address the safety crisis in front of us by leveraging humans’ ability to drive while simultaneously simplifying the challenging roadway environments in which today’s drivers operate. Reduction in speed limits, roadway designs that discourage dangerous behavior, smart traffic enforcement, eliminating distractions, and better vehicle designs are straightforward changes that should be encouraged and implemented. And of course, it wouldn’t hurt to enact policies that make it easier to get out of the car altogether.


The views expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Eno Center for Transportation.

Share

Related Articles

Op-Ed: Why Automated Driving Faces a Monster Uphill Battle

Op-Ed: Why Automated Driving Faces a Monster Uphill Battle

My three-year-old daughter takes her friend’s power wheels car for a first-time spin. I briefly show her how to turn the steering wheel...

Are federal AV investigations a first step toward federal regulation? Not necessarily, experts say

Are federal AV investigations a first step toward federal regulation? Not necessarily, experts say

"There hasn't been a lot of concrete regulation. The federal government has been largely permissive, and there are very few regulatory...

Webinar: The New Mobilities: Smart Planning for Emerging Transportation Technologies

Webinar: The New Mobilities: Smart Planning for Emerging Transportation Technologies

New transportation technologies are coming online faster than ever. While many of these emerging technologies are helping to expand our...

Congressional Hearing Discusses Promises and Perils of Automated Vehicles

Congressional Hearing Discusses Promises and Perils of Automated Vehicles

On May 18, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce’s Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce held a hearing on "Promises and...

Guest Op-Ed: The Current State of Public Policy for Autonomous Trucking

Guest Op-Ed: The Current State of Public Policy for Autonomous Trucking

The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) has long advocated for the benefits autonomous vehicles can bring to the nation’s...

Senate Commerce Looks at AV Development, but Pulls Bill from Schedule

Senate Commerce Looks at AV Development, but Pulls Bill from Schedule

This week, a Senate committee hearing looked at autonomous vehicle (AV) safety regulation, but the committee then postponed debate on AV...

Research on Low Speed Automated Vehicles Demonstrates Their Limitations and Potential

Research on Low Speed Automated Vehicles Demonstrates Their Limitations and Potential

During the final week of the Transportation Research Board’s annual meeting, the Transit Cooperative Research Program released...

Webinar: How Automated Delivery Could Shape the Future of Local Commerce

Webinar: How Automated Delivery Could Shape the Future of Local Commerce

COVID-19 has highlighted both the value of home delivery and contactless service. Automated vehicles (AV) could potentially enable both....

Guest Op-Ed: It Turns Out, Humans Are Pretty Smart: Developing Self-Driving Cars Is Harder Than We Thought

Guest Op-Ed: It Turns Out, Humans Are Pretty Smart: Developing Self-Driving Cars Is Harder Than We Thought

Self-driving cars. We’ve been promised for years they were “coming soon.” Most estimates a decade ago thought self-driving cars would...

Webinar: Automated Vehicle Technology, Public Policy, and BMW's Level 3 AV System

Webinar: Automated Vehicle Technology, Public Policy, and BMW's Level 3 AV System

While much of the transportation-related news has been focused on COVID-19 recovery, automated vehicle technologies are quietly progressing...

New Automated Vehicle Safety Self-Assessment from BMW Reveals AV Technology Progress, Policy Gaps

New Automated Vehicle Safety Self-Assessment from BMW Reveals AV Technology Progress, Policy Gaps

Last week BMW quietly released a new Voluntary Safety Self-Assessment (VSSA), which was posted to the National Highway Traffic Safety...

House Tees Up Revamp of an Automated Vehicle Bill

House Tees Up Revamp of an Automated Vehicle Bill

On Tuesday, February 11, the House Committee on Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection & Commerce held a hearing on...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks