Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

December 11, 2020  | Paul Lewis

Perhaps we are still distracted by the election. Perhaps commuting patterns have changed so much that it is not as important.

But unless you live in or around Cincinnati, you probably have not been following one of the biggest infrastructure disasters in recent years: the closure of the Brent Spence Bridge (BSB) in Cincinnati. While nobody was killed or even hurt, the incident displays the tragic state of America’s infrastructure and the inability for this country to do anything about it.

The BSB carries two major interstate highways (I-71 and I-75) and more than 150,000 vehicles every day over the Ohio River between Northern Kentucky and downtown Cincinnati. On Nov. 11, two semi-trucks collided on the bridge, causing a massive overnight fire. Once the fire was extinguished, inspection crews determined that the crash might have caused structural damage to the steel girders and concrete decking.

The bridge was promptly shut to all vehicular traffic on it and barge traffic under it. It is expected to reopen for cars and trucks on Dec. 23 but only if crews are able to access the damaged section with their heavy equipment. Transportation departments in Kentucky and Ohio scrambled to set up detours to manage the changing traffic patterns.

The BSB is a classic example of an overused, under-maintained transportation asset whose upgrade has been deferred for decades. Built in 1963 to accommodate three lanes of traffic in each direction on its two decks, engineers in the 1980s decided to eliminate the shoulders and narrow the lanes to 11 feet so that four lanes of traffic can travel in each direction. Drivers experience a harrowing four lanes of heavy traffic at high speed followed by a messy interchange. Such a crash was inevitable (and probably avoidable) on the bridge that federal inspectors have deemed “functionally obsolete” since the 1990s.

Rebuilding the BSB has been deferred in large part because of its $2.6 billion estimated cost. Including the connecting ramps, the per-mile cost of a new 1,700-foot bridge will be more expensive than tunneling a new subway under New York City. While regional leaders have pushed Washington for a replacement since at least 2008, funding has not arrived and local officials resisted other funding sources such as tolls.

The bridge also suffers from another root cause of so much infrastructure dysfunction: governance. The bridge is owned by Kentucky, so the responsibility for maintenance and rebuilding ultimately falls there, not on Ohio. But the transportation link is an important asset for both sides of the Ohio River as well as the nation, carrying cars and trucks bound for destinations far outside that immediate region. But like the Gateway rail project between New York and New Jersey, the high price tag, lack of regional cooperation and tepid federal interest prevents action.

Assuming engineers can patch the BSB and reopen it for traffic later next month, discussions about how to build a replacement need to proceed with more urgency. However, planners and policymakers should also consider other options. Rerouting I-71 and I-75 around Cincinnati on existing roads instead of through it would alleviate some of the demand while causing a relatively minor inconvenience for longer distance drivers. Tolling, perhaps in the form of congestion pricing, could be a sustainable revenue source as well as an incentive for more efficient use. Changes in long term travel patterns from COVID-19concerns for climate and considerations for racial equity should also weigh into the decision.

It is also time to reconsider how we fund and maintain America’s infrastructure broadly. As rumbles of an infrastructure package continue in Washington, placing more emphasis on maintenance and asset management is gaining traction from both progressives and conservatives. Designing for safety over capacity can help save lives and avert disasters. Reforming governance to improve regional coordination and better decisions is long overdue.

All these components can be part of a smart infrastructure package designed to tackle the coming century’s challenges rather than fix last century’s mistakes.


This op-ed was originally published in The Hill. 

Share

Related Articles

Can Biden build a bridge to fix America's infrastructure problems?

Can Biden build a bridge to fix America's infrastructure problems?

Designed to support state-level transportation projects, Paul Lewis, vice president of policy at Eno Center for Transportation, said states...

The repair of a vital Memphis bridge could take 2 months, chief engineer says. The impacts are already being felt

The repair of a vital Memphis bridge could take 2 months, chief engineer says. The impacts are already being felt

"A bridge like this could likely qualify, but it's hard to say what the metrics will be," said Paul Lewis, vice president of policy and...

Can Congress fix I-80? How Biden’s expected infrastructure plan could impact Sacramento

Can Congress fix I-80? How Biden’s expected infrastructure plan could impact Sacramento

Saying a bridge is deficient “doesn’t mean the bridge is about to fall down. That kind of thing is very rare. Things that engineers do...

Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

Perhaps we are still distracted by the election. Perhaps commuting patterns have changed so much that it is not as important. But unless...

Rapid Response Webinar: The House Surface Transportation Bill: Initial Overview

Rapid Response Webinar: The House Surface Transportation Bill: Initial Overview

Eno’s Jeff Davis summarizes the funding levels and major programmatic changes under the $490 billion surface transportation authorization...

FHWA Gives Out $2B in FY20 General Fund Highway Formula Funding

FHWA Gives Out $2B in FY20 General Fund Highway Formula Funding

The Federal Highway Administration has apportioned to states the $2 billion in additional highway formula funding from general revenues...

Performance Goals Force Some States to Prioritize NHS Bridges, Interstate Maintenance

Performance Goals Force Some States to Prioritize NHS Bridges, Interstate Maintenance

As the Eno Center's recent study, Refreshing the Status Quo: Federal Highway Programs and Funding Distribution pointed out, at present, the...

DOT Gives $225M in Grants for One-Off Discretionary Bridge Program

DOT Gives $225M in Grants for One-Off Discretionary Bridge Program

The U.S. Department of Transportation on August 29 announced that 20 highway bridge replacement projects would split $225 million in grant...

The FY20 Budget: USDOT Competitive Grant Programs

The FY20 Budget: USDOT Competitive Grant Programs

March 20, 2019 What a difference a year makes. In its fiscal 2019 budget request, the Trump Administration requested zero dollars...

$3.2 Billion in General Fund Highway Funding Apportioned to States

$3.2 Billion in General Fund Highway Funding Apportioned to States

March 19, 2019 The Federal Highway Administration, in a funding notice (N4510.835) dated March 15, formally gave states DOTs $3.2...

FY20 New Starts Report Still Rates Gateway Projects Medium-Low, Making Them Ineligible for Federal Funding

FY20 New Starts Report Still Rates Gateway Projects Medium-Low, Making Them Ineligible for Federal Funding

March 15, 2019 As part of the Trump Administration's fiscal 2020 budget (slow your) rollout, the Federal Transit Administration this...

Transportation and Infrastructure in the State of the Union Address, 1999-2018

Transportation and Infrastructure in the State of the Union Address, 1999-2018

February 4, 2019 As we all await President Trump's State of the Union address tomorrow, it is worth looking back at the times that...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks