Op-Ed: Private Activity Bonds Fuel Innovative Infrastructure Projects

Op-Ed: Private Activity Bonds Fuel Innovative Infrastructure Projects

March 29, 2018  | Jennifer Aument

The United States has significant infrastructure investment needs. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gives U.S. infrastructure an overall grade of D+ and estimates that the U.S. needs to invest $4.5 trillion in infrastructure by 2025, including $2.042 trillion for surface transportation infrastructure such as highways, transit, and intermodal projects. However, public funding for infrastructure falls well below these needs; ASCE notes that the gap between what the U.S. is currently spending and our infrastructure investment needs through 2025 for surface transportation infrastructure alone is $1.101 trillion. Federal, State, and local governments do not have sufficient funding dedicated to infrastructure investment, and in the past they have shown a willingness to defer infrastructure spending when budgets are tight.

To decrease the infrastructure investment gap we should encourage private investment in infrastructure. The Administration is seeking to achieve $1.5 trillion in infrastructure investment, including significant investment from the private sector. This approach to leverage private sector funding is the most effective way to ensure the infrastructure objectives are met, and is consistent with today’s spending profile where only around 25% of infrastructure investment comes directly from the Federal Government.

Released in February, the Administration’s legislative outline on infrastructure calls for $200 billion in direct Federal funding over 10 years for new infrastructure grant programs, increased funding for DOT and USDA loan programs, and a Federal capital financing fund. The plan provides $20 billion to expand infrastructure finance tools that provide lower-cost loans to both public and private project sponsors and makes critical improvements to several categories of Private Activity Bonds (PABs).

PABs are a critical finance tool for infrastructure investment. Since the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) surface transportation reauthorization was passed in 2005, the Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued over $8.2 billion in PABs used to advance highway, transit, and intermodal surface transportation projects across the country and the PABs invested are estimated to have stimulated in excess of $30 billion of economic activity.

The PABs framework has facilitated significant private investment in these transformative infrastructure projects, including by supporting public private partnership (P3) projects that would otherwise likely not have been possible, leading to total infrastructure investment on these projects of approximately $33.3 billion as reported by Public Works Financing. These projects, supported by PABs, have generated substantial public benefits through increasing infrastructure investment, delivering projects that reduce congestion, supporting jobs and enhancing economic growth.

PABs are an essential tool not only for attracting private sector financing at competitive pricing but also to ensuring transformative infrastructure projects actually get built. PABs funding lowers project costs and enables governments to successfully deliver projects that would not otherwise be possible, but the PABs framework has also created a lending market of senior lenders willing to finance greenfield demand risk projects – where states pass key risks to the private sector during development and operations. It is unlikely that these projects would have secured sufficient private debt without PABs as there hasn’t been a proven alternative identified in almost a decade. States could arguably retain all of the project risks, and finance the projects with municipal financing, but this option is rarely used for such projects as doing so would degrade municipal risk profiles, damage state credit ratings, and reduce the opportunity to use those funds for other public benefit projects which don’t generate revenue. As a result, states have been reticent to take this approach.

Federal credit programs like PABs are instrumental in fueling pioneering infrastructure projects that may not otherwise be feasible – projects that support transformational improvements that are unlocking our most congested cities. In the coming months, as it considers a comprehensive infrastructure bill, I urge Congress to follow the Administration’s proposal to expand the PABs program, allowing this financing tool to continue to be used to support investment in much-needed infrastructure projects across the country.

Want to stay in touch with Eno? Subscribe to our mailing list
Want to learn more about joining Eno?  Check out our individual and group memberships!

Share

Related Articles

Webinar Recap: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

Webinar Recap: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

The coronavirus pandemic has hammered state and municipal budgets across the United States. A recent analysis from the National League of...

1953 Buckner Highway Study for Eisenhower

1953 Buckner Highway Study for Eisenhower

This is a study of a national system of federal toll roads commissioned by Dwight Eisenhower during his pre-presidential transition in New...

Clay Committee Report Original Transmittal Letter

Clay Committee Report Original Transmittal Letter

This is a PDF of the original letter from the five members of President Eisenhower's "Clay Committee" transmitting their final report on "A...

January 1956 White House Meeting with GOP Leaders on Highway Bill

January 1956 White House Meeting with GOP Leaders on Highway Bill

This is an internal White House summary of the January 31, 1956 meeting between President Eisenhower, his staff and key Cabinet members...

1955 White House Internal Debates on Clay Commission Report

1955 White House Internal Debates on Clay Commission Report

This PDF file contains a series of memos by John S. Bragdon, President Eisenhower's Special Assistant for Public Works Planning, during...

Recap of Eno Webinar on Equity in Congestion Pricing

Recap of Eno Webinar on Equity in Congestion Pricing

In August, Eno hosted a webinar titled Congestion Pricing’s Role in Building More Equitable Transportation Systems. The webinar was a...

1954 Inter-Agency Committee on the President's Highway Program

1954 Inter-Agency Committee on the President's Highway Program

This is a PDF file of documents from the 1954 "inside" Eisenhower Administration committee originally intended to parallel the "outside"...

Record of Briefing State Governors on Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan - November 3, 1955

Record of Briefing State Governors on Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan - November 3, 1955

This PDF file is a one-page memo to Treasury Secretary George Humphrey from Dan Throop Smith, head of tax analysis at Treasury, dated...

October 28, 1955 Cabinet Meeting on Highways

October 28, 1955 Cabinet Meeting on Highways

This PDF file contains documents relating to the October 28, 1955 Cabinet meeting. This was another meeting conducted in the absence of...

September 30, 1955 Cabinet Meeting

September 30, 1955 Cabinet Meeting

This PDF file contains records from the Eisenhower Library on the Cabinet meeting of September 30, 1955, which was historic in several...

December 1955 Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan

December 1955 Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan

This PDF file contains three documents, in order: A December 8, 1955 memo to Treasury Secretary George Humphrey from Dan Throop Smith...

Webinar: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

Webinar: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

The COVID-19 pandemic hammered state and municipal budgets across the United States. A recent analysis by the National League of Cities...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks