Op-Ed: The Future of Transportation Is Unremarkable

Op-Ed: The Future of Transportation Is Unremarkable

July 07, 2017  | Paul Lewis

July 7, 2017

Being stuck in traffic provides ample time to dream up creative ideas for revolutionizing how we travel. Tech magnate Elon Musk famously thought up the Hyperloop while sitting in Los Angeles’ notorious roadway gridlock. He created The Boring Company to create a network of underground tunnels for the high-speed movement of vehicles in dense urban areas. Others evangelize about technologies such as personal rapid transit (PRT), monorails, and magnetic levitation trains (maglev) systems, with pods and trains gliding above or around congested roads to deliver passengers and packages.

Futuristic transportation modes would undoubtedly change the nature of transportation, but widespread implementation is not realistic. Too much attention on ultramodern technology in transportation distracts us from the mundane but crucial improvements that must be made to the existing system. It also leapfrogs over incredible advances in automated vehicles, a revolutionary technology that still needs time and attention before widespread operation on public roadways.

There are three major problems with futuristic transportation hype:

They are not brand-new ideas. The most hyped transportation innovations are actually slight twists on old ideas. The first subway in New York was actually an early Hyperloop: a vacuum-powered tube that shuttled passengers under busy Manhattan streets. The concept worked but its expensive price tag and technological hurdles meant investors found it more effective to build electrified railways that today carry 5.7 million rides per day. The first modern patents for maglev trains came in the early 1960s, but only four systems operate today in China, Japan, and South Korea. The best engineers in the world have been building tunnels under mountains and cities for hundreds of years. And the U.S. government funded a PRT demonstration project in West Virginia in the 1970s (which they still call the “pod cars of the future”), which is only open during the school year.

They are not cheaper than current alternatives. Examples of futuristic transportation promise to not only to be fast and convenient, but also be a fraction of the cost of alternatives. Hyperloop proposals claim a Los Angeles to San Francisco line cost of $6 billion, a fraction of the cost of the current $68 billion California high speed rail project. The Boring Company is largely driven by the belief that new approaches can dramatically undercut the cost of current tunneling technology, despite decades of the world’s top engineers working on the same issue. In each case, estimators vastly undercount the cost of acquiring land, engineering for safety standards, and other factors that traditional modes have long faced.

They will not benefit everyone. Futuristic transportation modes claim to target broad problems but, in reality, they would only address the transportation concerns of wealthy people. Even if there were a Hyperloop system between major U.S. cities, it would serve only relatively infrequent white-collar business and leisure travelers. It would not be practical for construction workers from San Francisco to commute daily to work on a project in Los Angeles. Even if Musk is able to build an underground network of car-carrying machines, only the top earners will be able to afford it. Most commuters will be stuck on the same congested roadways as before. Examine PRT proposals and you’ll find sleek, modern pods circulating between business districts and suburban parking lots that rarely include provisions for disabled access.

Of course transportation needs new ideas and revolutionary concepts to make the whole system work better for everyone. But most of the ideas that grab headlines distract us from the real problems plaguing the transportation network.

While people are gushing over Hyperloop, engineers are hard at work implementing modern air traffic control systems. While Elon Musk is digging holes in his parking lots, the railroad tunnels that bring 200,000 trips in and out of Manhattan every day are in danger of shutting for repair. While we debate the merits of PRT, Houston and Seattle have redesigned their bus networks to serve more people using the same amount of resources.

Let’s keep dreams alive, but direct our attention to improving the road, air, and rail systems that are already the foundation of our economy and society. They will still be so in the future.

Share

Related Articles

Transit Ridership: Not Expected to Return to Pre-Pandemic Levels This Decade

Transit Ridership: Not Expected to Return to Pre-Pandemic Levels This Decade

Since the COVID pandemic began, transit agencies have been trying to figure out when all their riders will come back. Although local bus...

Webinar: Planning for People: The History and Future of Inclusive Transit Planning

Webinar: Planning for People: The History and Future of Inclusive Transit Planning

Who was transit built for? For what purpose? And how has that approach changed? Join Eno for a webinar that will answer these questions and...

Metro’s Recurring Problems Raise Questions About Oversight, Management

Metro’s Recurring Problems Raise Questions About Oversight, Management

With most transportation systems, it is clear who is responsible, said Robert Puentes, president of the Eno Center for Transportation, a...

Transit agencies struggle to access funding, rights-of-way, due to complex governance structures

Transit agencies struggle to access funding, rights-of-way, due to complex governance structures

Public transit agencies are busy creating new strategies to deal with multiple problems, said Paul Lewis, chief finance officer and...

Tackling Governance in Transit Megaprojects – Key Lessons from Eno’s Examination of Transit Governance in Austin

Tackling Governance in Transit Megaprojects – Key Lessons from Eno’s Examination of Transit Governance in Austin

Over two dozen new rail transit projects are set to open for service across the United States by 2030. There will likely be even more...

Guest Op-Ed: Reclaiming the National Narrative on Transit Safety

Guest Op-Ed: Reclaiming the National Narrative on Transit Safety

In our daily lives, we often take for granted the numerous protections in place to ensure we arrive safely at our destinations. The now...

Webinar: Transit Strategies to Meet Climate Goals

Webinar: Transit Strategies to Meet Climate Goals

Cutting greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, which account for 29 percent of total emissions in the United States, is going to...

Guest Op-Ed: Preparing Transit for the Future of Work

Guest Op-Ed: Preparing Transit for the Future of Work

The scale and speed of the transformation in the nature of work caused by the COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented. Remote work, which has...

Congress and White House Open the Flow of Public Transportation Funds

Congress and White House Open the Flow of Public Transportation Funds

Taking into account funding from the infrastructure law and the proposed FY2022 budget, total FTA funding will jump more than...

Webinar: Reforming Governance to Transform Cities

Webinar: Reforming Governance to Transform Cities

Cities own the streets that transit agencies need for their bus lanes. Regions often lack a coordinated entity to oversee implementation of...

Links to the Text of Major Highway and Mass Transit Authorization Laws

Links to the Text of Major Highway and Mass Transit Authorization Laws

Links to the Text of Major Highway and Mass Transit Authorization Laws 2021 IIJA (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act), a.k.a....

Guest Op-Ed: What Would a Land Value Tax Mean for Transportation?

Guest Op-Ed: What Would a Land Value Tax Mean for Transportation?

Transportation  drives the American economy. It determines the costs of trade, the ease of accessing services, and the interconnectedness...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks