New Trust Fund Forecast Shows Just How Broken the 80-20 Highway-Transit Revenue Split Has Become

New Trust Fund Forecast Shows Just How Broken the 80-20 Highway-Transit Revenue Split Has Become

January 30, 2020  | Jeff Davis

As Congress starts debating infrastructure bills, there is a lot of talk about getting the Highway Trust Fund back on a sound, user-pay basis and not repeating the $144 billion of bailouts from other sources that have been necessary to keep the Trust Fund afloat since it first ran out of money in 2008. The House Democratic infrastructure principles released this week include a call to “Address the long-term solvency of the Highway Trust Fund through user-based mechanisms.”

In the short term, there is no highway user tax or fee that can fill the Trust Fund’s revenue hole quickly enough except for an increase in the federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel. Other taxes can work around the edges, and the replacement of a fuel tax with a mileage fee is a promising option but would take close to a decade to fully implement.

But any increase in motor fuels taxes will have to address the looming mass transit funding imbalance that did not exist when Congress was debating earlier tax increases.

The 1982 motor fuels tax increase was made possible by a political deal – urban legislators would vote for the increase in exchange for 1 cent of the 5 cent per gallon tax increase being deposited in a new Mass Transit Account and dedicated to mass transit funding. The 1990 and 1993 fuels tax increases, once finally deposited in the Trust Fund, were also split 80-20, so that today, the Transit Account gets 2.86 cents per gallon (20 percent of 1982’s 5 cent increase, 1990’s 5 cent increase, and 1993’s 4.3 cent increase). All of the pre-1982 tax rate of 4 cents per gallon, and all of the trucking taxes, stay in the Highway Account.

Highway stakeholders, while they love to grumble about highway user revenues being “diverted” to transit, have generally gone along with the 80-20 split since then, acknowledging that it would be much harder to pass bills if the transit lobby started opposing the bills. Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) tried to throw transit back out of the Trust Fund in 2003-2004, and Rep. John Mica (R-FL) tried to do the same thing in 2011-2012, but neither man came close to having the votes to do so.

Meanwhile, Congress kept enacting authorization bills that gave transit funding levels that exceeded Mass Transit Account revenues by greater and greater amounts – and all the while, tax rates stayed flat. The result is that the Mass Transit Account today is far more out of balance than the Highway Account, on a percentage basis. (For example, the just-enacted FY 2020 appropriations process allows $48.6 billion in new Highway Account obligation authority, versus an estimated $38.1 billion in tax revenues coming into the Account, an overage of $10.4 billion, or 27 percent over tax receipts. The Mass Transit Account got $10.2 billion in new obligation authority against $5.3 billion in estimated tax revenues, an overage of $4.9 billion, or 92 percent over tax receipts.)

We took the new Congressional Budget Office cash flow baseline for the Trust Fund, which is premised on current tax rates (and on the FY 2020 appropriated spending totals, extrapolated forwards and given annual inflation increases of about 2 percent per year). Then we took the detailed CBO tax receipt forecast (Tab 5 of this spreadsheet) and divided each year’s estimated HTF gasoline tax receipts by 18.3 and the estimated diesel tax receipts by 24.3 to figure out how much money each current penny of motor fuels tax raises, and ran some scenarios.

Caveat: This approach assumes that demand for gasoline is completely inelastic and that no increase in price caused by a tax increase will reduce demand. (This is not completely true but it is mostly true about the levels we are talking about.) And we are ignoring the effects that increased excise tax rates have on income tax receipts for the general fund, which is a problem for a later day. Also, Congress would probably phase in a tax increase over time, and index it for inflation after that, but that looked like too much work for me, so we are assuming the entire tax increase up front.

The current baseline shows the Mass Transit Account running out of money late in FY 2021 and the Highway Account running out of money sometime in FY 2022. By the end of 2030, the Highway Account will be $144 billion in arrears and the Mass Transit Account will be $43 billion in the red.

Suppose we increased gas and diesel taxes by 10 cents per gallon, effective on October 1, 2020 (the first day of fiscal year 2021), split the proceeds 80-20 between highways and transit, and kept everything else in the CBO baseline the same?

As you can see, a 10 cent increase split 80-20 keeps highways solvent at baseline spending levels, but it only postpones the date of the Mass Transit Account’s insolvency by two years, from 2021 to 2023.

Okay, let’s double that – a 20 cents per gallon increase, immediately (which more than doubles the current gasoline tax and almost doubles the diesel tax), split 80-20, with everything else being the same as baseline:

A 20 cent per gallon immediate tax increase, split 80-20, would keep the Mass Transit Account solvent for a decade with at $1-2 billion dollars to spare at baseline spending levels. But the 80 percent of the money going to highways would support $145 billion or so in highway spending above baseline.

The assumptions underlying the cash flow baseline spending levels call for $551 billion in new obligation authority for the Highway Account for the ten-year 2021-2030 period versus $114 billion in Mass Transit Account obligation authority. In other words, under the baseline, the Highway Account would get 83 percent of the new spending authority over a decade. If you allowed the Highway Account to spend all that extra money they would get from 80 percent of a 20 cent tax hike, that would be close to $700 billion in new highway spending, not $551 billion, while transit would still be stuck at $114 billion over 10 years.

After much trial and error, we hit upon the bare minimum tax increase, and the bare minimum highway-transit split, that could be levied immediately to keep both accounts of the Trust Fund solvent for a decade at baseline spending levels. The magic formula appears to be:

An immediate 11 cent per gallon motor fuels tax increase, split 71 percent highways, 29 percent transit.

The other option, of course, is to cut mass transit spending from the Transit Account well below baseline levels, or (if spending is to be increased above baseline) to give transit much less of a percentage increase than highways, which might allow the 80-20 split of new revenues to continue. But the mass transit lobby likely would not sit still for that.

On the other hand, how far north of 20 percent will the highway lobby allow transit to take out of any new highway user revenue increases before some highway-focused states and pro-highway organizations start to walk away?

Share

Related Articles

Final Highway Trust Fund Tax Receipts Were Robust in FY 2020 - Suspiciously So

Final Highway Trust Fund Tax Receipts Were Robust in FY 2020 - Suspiciously So

The books have closed on federal fiscal year 2020, which ended on September 30, and despite coronavirus and its effects on travel and the...

Gasoline Production Plateau Continues at 10 percent Below 2019

Gasoline Production Plateau Continues at 10 percent Below 2019

Data from the Energy Department through the end of September continue to support the hypothesis that, post-lockdowns, U.S. gasoline...

Administration Befuddles Congress With Highway Trust Fund Revenue Estimates

Administration Befuddles Congress With Highway Trust Fund Revenue Estimates

As legislators and Congressional staff negotiate the parameters of what increasingly looks like a one-year extension of the FAST Act, the...

Record of Briefing State Governors on Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan - November 3, 1955

Record of Briefing State Governors on Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan - November 3, 1955

This PDF file is a one-page memo to Treasury Secretary George Humphrey from Dan Throop Smith, head of tax analysis at Treasury, dated...

October 28, 1955 Cabinet Meeting on Highways

October 28, 1955 Cabinet Meeting on Highways

This PDF file contains documents relating to the October 28, 1955 Cabinet meeting. This was another meeting conducted in the absence of...

December 1955 Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan

December 1955 Revised Eisenhower Highway Plan

This PDF file contains three documents, in order: A December 8, 1955 memo to Treasury Secretary George Humphrey from Dan Throop Smith...

1959 Gore-Eisenhower Letters

1959 Gore-Eisenhower Letters

This PDF file is an exchange of letters between Senator Albert Gore (D-TN) and President Eisenhower in the fall of 1959. Gore sent...

Highway Trust Fund Tax Receipts Rebound to Normal Levels

Highway Trust Fund Tax Receipts Rebound to Normal Levels

This morning, the Treasury Department published the monthly report of Highway Trust Fund tax receipts for July 2020, and those numbers show...

U.S. Gasoline Production Stabilizes At 12% Below Last Year's Levels

U.S. Gasoline Production Stabilizes At 12% Below Last Year's Levels

The latest weekly production reports from the Energy Department show that the production of gasoline by U.S. refineries and blenders has...

June HTF Tax Receipts Were 41% Below Last Year

June HTF Tax Receipts Were 41% Below Last Year

The Treasury Department issued its monthly report on Highway Trust Fund revenues this week, covering June 2020. Net tax deposits into the...

HTF Tax Receipts Plummet in May

HTF Tax Receipts Plummet in May

The Treasury Department has posted its Highway Trust Fund financial report for May 2020, and it shows (for the first time) the full effects...

If Paid For By Motor Fuels Taxes, DeFazio Bill Would Double Federal Gas Tax

If Paid For By Motor Fuels Taxes, DeFazio Bill Would Double Federal Gas Tax

The ambitious surface transportation reauthorization bill unveiled this week by House Transportation and Infrastructure chairman Peter...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks