How Much Will the Infrastructure Bill Really Add to the Deficit?

How Much Will the Infrastructure Bill Really Add to the Deficit?

November 17, 2021  | Jeff Davis

When the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office scored the bipartisan infrastructure bill that President Biden signed into law this week, their estimate said that enactment of the bill “would add $256 billion to projected deficits over that period.” But, due to limitations in CBO’s methodology, the real deficit increase from the higher spending levels in the bill will be closer to $375 billion.

CBO’s scorekeeping is limited by the fact they are required to use two completely different scorekeeping systems for two types of bills. One system is used for bills that affect revenues and/or “direct spending,” and the other is used for annual and supplemental appropriations bills (called “discretionary spending”).

This poses a specific problem for Highway Trust Fund programs, because they (along with the Airport Improvement Program) are the only programs in the entire federal government that, through a weird historical loophole, are classified as being both direct spending and discretionary spending. (The contract authority is provided by authorization laws and is considered direct spending, but the outlays from the Treasury when that authority is spent – which determine deficit impact – are classified as discretionary because the Appropriations Committees hold an annual veto over the totals.)

Table 2 in the CBO score shows that the bill increases contract authority out of the Trust Fund by $89 billion over the five-year period covered by the bill, and that those higher levels would then set the spending baseline for the Trust Fund at a level $107 billion higher for the five years after that. As acknowledged in the second paragraph of text on page 1 of the CBO estimate, “Over the 2022-2031 period, that total would be $196.5 billion more that the amount in CBO’s July 2021 baseline.”

If this spending authority is to be exercised, it will increase federal spending by outlays leaving the Treasury. Yet, because of the methodology CBO is required to use, the tables used in the estimate say that the outlays from the $196 billion in increased Highway Trust Fund contract authority would be zero.

The outlays from that spending will eventually be included in the scores of the annual USDOT appropriations bills for the next decade, but those numbers are buried in the back of the committee report and no one pays attention, because the way appropriations bills are scored and controlled, outlays don’t matter anymore. (And, the way that direct spending bills are scored and controlled, budget authority doesn’t matter, only outlays. Since HTF programs have direct budget authority and discretionary outlays, they tend to avoid both types of controls, as well as usually being exempt from sequestration and spending caps and PAYGO.)

ETW has done some modeling using outlay rates as used by CBO a couple of years ago. (Highway obligations spend out at 25 percent in year 1, 41 percent in year 2, etc, and transit formula obligations spend out at 10 percent in year 1, 30 percent in year 2, etc.). Using those percentages (and some guesswork for the much smaller NHTSA and FMCSA accounts), we estimate that, of the $196.5 billion in increased contract authority identified by CBO under the IIJA, about $117.6 billion of that will be spent via outlays over the ten-year period. (Unless the Appropriations Committees decide to impose lower limits, which they have no real reason to do.)

If CBO were to publicly release its own outlay estimate, it wouldn’t be exactly $117.6 billion, but we would be surprised if it was more than $5 billion off in either direction.

Adding this estimate of the real deficit increase from the increased Highway Trust Fund spending in the IIJA puts the 10-year deficit increase close to $375 billion, as follows (all of this except for our $117.6 billion estimate is taken directly from the tables in the CBO estimate):

Funding provided by the bill with outlays scored against the bill
10-Yr BA 10-Yr OT
Division D – Energy 7.5 7.3
Division G – Other Auth. 3.8 3.0
Division J Appropriations 446.3 415.4
Subtotal, BA provided by bill with outlays scored against bill 457.5 425.8
Revenue Losses from PAB etc Provisions (Div. H, Title IV) 1.2
Revenue Losses from Increased SRF Volume 1.9
TOTAL 10-YEAR COST (GROSS) SCORED BY CBO 428.8
Pay-Fors:
Customs User Fees -6.2
Extend Sequestration to FY2030 and FY 2031 -8.7
Sell Oil from SPR -6.1
Prescription Drug Rebate Provisions -54.0
Extend Enterprise Guarantee Fees -21.0
Rescind COVID Appropriations -13.4
Spectrum Auctions -10.2
Miscellaneous -1.3
Superfund Fees -14.5
Other Provisions -37.4
TOTAL PAY-FORS -172.7
10-YEAR DEFICIT INCREASE (NET) AS SCORED BY CBO 256.1
Highway Trust Fund Contract Authority Increase +196.5 +117.6
10-YEAR DEFICIT INCREASE ACTUALLY CAUSED BY THE BILL 373.7

Coincidentally, our estimate for the increased Highway Trust Fund outlays is exactly the size of the $118 billion bailout transfer contained in the infrastructure bill, whereby the general fund transfers that amount of money to the Highway Trust Fund to try and keep it solvent for five more years. Such “intragovernmental transfers” do not score as new spending because, it is said, the outlays to be enabled by such transfers are already included in the baseline, and the cardinal sin of budget scorekeeping is counting the same dollar twice on the same side of the ledger. But, the fact that bailout transfers are not scored is actually an argument why the (currently invisible) increased outlays from contract authority increases should be scored, or should at least be made more visible in CBO estimates.

Share

Related Articles

Senate Fails to Advance Bill Containing Extra $2B for Intercity Bus COVID Relief

Senate Fails to Advance Bill Containing Extra $2B for Intercity Bus COVID Relief

The U.S. Senate earlier today failed to muster the 60 votes necessary to bring up a $48 billion bill providing additional COVID relief,...

Biden's Cure for High Gasoline Prices? The 2021 Infrastructure Bill

Biden's Cure for High Gasoline Prices? The 2021 Infrastructure Bill

"The Biden infrastructure law should produce reduced demand for gasoline once projects now being allocated funding [are]...

Buttigieg Talks Workforce, IIJA Implementation With Senate Panel

Buttigieg Talks Workforce, IIJA Implementation With Senate Panel

Transportation workforce issues were front and center when Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg testified before the Senate Commerce,...

Workforce Issues Front-and-Center in Congress

Workforce Issues Front-and-Center in Congress

Last year, the President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC) released a report concluding that the United States is...

Buttigieg Defends FY23 Budget Request before Senate Appropriations

Buttigieg Defends FY23 Budget Request before Senate Appropriations

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg appeared before the Senate Appropriations Committee yesterday to defend the Biden Administration's...

Congressional Leaders Open Negotiations on FY23 Spending Total

Congressional Leaders Open Negotiations on FY23 Spending Total

The leaders of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees met yesterday to begin discussions of an overall total for the twelve regular...

How Much Could Inflation Erode IIJA Buying Power?

How Much Could Inflation Erode IIJA Buying Power?

Anyone who goes to a store, a restaurant, or a gas station can see that prices are going up, and most things cost measurably more than they...

USDOT Gets FY22 Highway and Transit Formula Funding Increases Out the Door

USDOT Gets FY22 Highway and Transit Formula Funding Increases Out the Door

Twin announcements from the U.S. Department of Transportation in the last week have given state and local governments permission to spend...

Step-by-Step: How $52.5 Billion in New Highway Formula Funding Becomes $47.1 Billion

Step-by-Step: How $52.5 Billion in New Highway Formula Funding Becomes $47.1 Billion

When Congress passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act last year, that bipartisan law was built around significant increases in...

Aviation Program Offset Blows Budget Hole in Senate’s COVID-19 Aid Plan

Aviation Program Offset Blows Budget Hole in Senate’s COVID-19 Aid Plan

The new CBO baseline will align with the Biden administration’s projection for the aviation program, said Jeff Davis, a senior...

Administration Again Proposes Unlikely Cuts in Corps Water Resources Budget

Administration Again Proposes Unlikely Cuts in Corps Water Resources Budget

The Biden Administration has proposed cutting the regular annual budget for the water resources program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers...

The FY23 Budget Request: The Big Picture (and the BIL's 2027 Problem)

The FY23 Budget Request: The Big Picture (and the BIL's 2027 Problem)

President Biden's 2023 budget only proposes de minimis changes in net spending and revenue totals for fiscal 2023 (increasing outlays by...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks