Guest Op-Ed: Use Incentives, Not Brute Force, To Encourage Needed MPO Consolidation

Guest Op-Ed: Use Incentives, Not Brute Force, To Encourage Needed MPO Consolidation

August 24, 2016  | Steve Heminger

Guest op-ed by Steve Heminger, Executive Director, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (the MPO for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area).

Regional planning and MPOs are a good thing, but as the old saying goes, you can sometimes have too much of a good thing. Such is the case in several large metropolitan areas around the country, where a single region is served by multiple MPOs. That is inefficient, confusing to the public, and just not good government.

On its way out the door, the Obama Administration has proposed a cure that is likely worse than the disease. As my colleague Barry Seymour from Philadelphia has pointed out, the DOT’s draft rule making could create a Frankenstein MPO that would sprawl over most of the Northeast Corridor. In other regions of the U.S., the proposed rule would disturb healthy and long-standing institutional relationships for the sake of minor overlaps in planning areas that don’t even yet exist — but might manifest themselves 20 years hence if certain growth patterns prevail.

I think there’s a better way to reform governance at the nation’s metropolitan planning organizations, as well as achieve more sustainable transportation outcomes in the bargain. My career has taught me time and again that it’s far easier to produce a desired change in behavior with carrots instead of sticks. And it just so happens that the federal government distributes over $55 billion in surface transportation carrots every year. The vast majority of that money is allocated to states, but a small and growing share is “suballocated” to the MPOs for project selection. Why not boost that suballocated share in the next authorizing bill and link its receipt to MPO governance reform where it’s needed, and to better system performance outcomes that are needed everywhere?  For that matter, the money allocated directly to the states could benefit from a performance linkage too.

This incentive-based approach is well advanced in California, where the state’s huge size and complexity have made distributed and devolved decision-making a necessity. As a result, the state has looked to the MPOs in California — especially those in the dynamic mega regions like the Bay Area, Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Diego — to do everything from planning to financing to actually building highway and transit projects, all the while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and minding a laundry list of other state policy objectives. Not coincidentally, this heavy dose of regionalism has been accompanied by greater levels of suballocated federal and state funding than anywhere else in the country.

Another telling example of carrot power dates to when Mary Peters served as DOT Secretary in the George W. Bush (43) Administration. Through a quirk in the congressional appropriations process, DOT was presented with a modest amount of unencumbered discretionary funds. Secretary Peters promptly seized the day, repurposing the money into a new Urban Partnership initiative with which she sought to spur cities to experiment with novel approaches to traffic congestion. In fact, the most notable legacy of that effort was a failure – a large incentive grant contingent upon authorization of congestion pricing for midtown Manhattan was effectively turned down when the New York State legislature killed the proposal through inaction.

But the real lesson of that episode was this: absent the federal funds on offer, they wouldn’t even have had the debate. A bigger carrot might have done the trick.

So I would humbly suggest that DOT put away the rule book and take out its check book to address MPO governance reform. We may need fewer than 400+ MPOs across the land. But we need stronger regional planning and policy engagement if the federal transportation program is going to get the best bang for its limited buck.

Mr. Heminger’s views are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Eno Center for Transportation.

Share

Related Articles

Peter DeFazio to Retire, Setting Off Race to Fill Head Dem Slot on T&I Panel

Peter DeFazio to Retire, Setting Off Race to Fill Head Dem Slot on T&I Panel

Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, announced this week that he will not seek...

Senate Confirms Sullenberger to ICAO, Tees Up NMB Vote Next Week

Senate Confirms Sullenberger to ICAO, Tees Up NMB Vote Next Week

The U.S. Senate on December 2 confirmed former airline pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger to be the U.S. Ambassador to the International...

Senate Panel Approves DOT, FMC Nominees, but Sen. Scott Puts Hold on All DOT Noms

Senate Panel Approves DOT, FMC Nominees, but Sen. Scott Puts Hold on All DOT Noms

On November 17, the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee approved two more Presidential nominees for transportation...

White House Names 3 More DOT Nominees; 4 Others Approved in Committee

White House Names 3 More DOT Nominees; 4 Others Approved in Committee

This week, President Biden transmitted three more U.S. Department of Transportation nominees to the Senate, while the Commerce, Science and...

Guiding the New UAS Industry to Safety Excellence

Guiding the New UAS Industry to Safety Excellence

The aviation industry and regulators are achieving many notable successes in creating effective policies to facilitate the integration of...

Biden Signs Sweeping Market Competition/Concentration Order

Biden Signs Sweeping Market Competition/Concentration Order

On July 9, President Biden signed one of the widest-ranging executive orders of his Administration, EO 14036, "Promoting Competition in the...

Monje Confirmed at USDOT; White House Makes FMC Nomination

Monje Confirmed at USDOT; White House Makes FMC Nomination

Yesterday afternoon, the U.S. Senate confirmed the nomination of Carlos Monje, Jr. to be the number 3 official at the U.S. Department of...

Revised Version of House Democratic Transportation Bill to Be Marked Up Tomorrow

Revised Version of House Democratic Transportation Bill to Be Marked Up Tomorrow

Yesterday, the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee released a revised version of the INVEST in America Act...

Op-Ed: Federal Transportation Policy’s Prerequisites

Op-Ed: Federal Transportation Policy’s Prerequisites

The future of the federal surface transportation program is uncertain and clouded by an ever-widening range of parallel and perhaps...

Senate Likely to Amend Buy America Bill to Exempt Aggregates and Cement

Senate Likely to Amend Buy America Bill to Exempt Aggregates and Cement

After two weeks of floor debate and many amendments, the U.S. Senate is on the edge of passing S. 1260, a bill intended to revitalize U.S....

Pending Senate Bill Would Alter Buy America Requirements

Pending Senate Bill Would Alter Buy America Requirements

The U.S. Senate is in the middle of considering the "Endless Frontier Act" (S. 1260) – an umbrella bill assembled by Majority Leader...

House Members Request $20.8 Billion in Earmarks

House Members Request $20.8 Billion in Earmarks

Now that Congress has brought back earmarking, House members have filed requests for 5,267 projects totaling $20.75 billion. House...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks