Guest Op-Ed: Resilient Infrastructure Can Help Us Adapt to a Warmer World

Guest Op-Ed: Resilient Infrastructure Can Help Us Adapt to a Warmer World

November 22, 2017  | Emil Frankel
Ed. Note: This op-ed originally appeared in The Progressive on November 13, 2017
 
President Donald Trump has proclaimed November “Critical Infrastructure and Resilience Month.” He is right to recognize the key role that infrastructure plays in assuring the nation’s health, security and prosperity. However, much of our critical infrastructure—especially transportation systems in coastal areas—is anything but resilient. We can change that by facing up to climate threats and designing our infrastructure accordingly.
 
Climate threats are real, and growing. Experience has shown, and scientific studies have confirmed, that sea levels are rising at accelerating rates—and could swell by eight feet by the end of this century. With rising seas comes a heightened risk of storm surges and flooding from hurricanes, tropical storms, and Nor’easters. And warmer oceans are fueling record-breaking storms, like the hurricanes that recently devastated Texas, Florida and the Caribbean.
 
At the same time, extended heat waves, droughts and heavy rains are occurring with greater frequency. This places extraordinary pressures on highways and roads, tunnels and bridges, telecommunications networks, power generation plants and transmission lines, and water and sewage treatment facilities.
 
While the Trump administration has withdrawn from efforts to mitigate climate change, we have no choice but to adapt to a warmer world. Indeed, even if the international community reduced greenhouse gas emissions to the levels called for in the Paris climate agreement, gases already in the atmosphere will ensure warming for centuries to come.
 
A proactive response must go beyond the investments in research and development President Trump has recommended. Today, it is crucial to incorporate resilience into infrastructure planning.
 
Design standards for new or rebuilt infrastructure should reflect the realities of a changing climate. For example, federal standards should require that bridges over navigable waters be constructed at greater heights and incorporate design elements that will enable them to withstand severe flooding and storm surges. And FEMA should mandate that infrastructure damaged by catastrophic events be rebuilt to higher and more resilient standards. But the Trump administration is moving in the opposite direction: In August, the president rescinded an Obama-era standard designed to reduce flood risks to infrastructure.
 
Retrofitting (or even relocating) existing elements of the transportation system, like coastal rail lines and subway networks, will be extraordinarily expensive. But disaster is expensive too—and the costs of disaster are borne by society, often crowding out other necessary investments. Consider this: if sea levels rise a foot or more, the runways of virtually every major commercial airport on the East and Gulf coasts would be under water. That is a cost we cannot bear.
 
Resilient infrastructure—while costly—is a wise investment. Every dollar spent on disaster prevention and resilience saves an average of $4 down the line.
 
Protecting our infrastructure is essential to Americans’ mobility, safety and security.
 
Recognizing the importance of infrastructure––as President Trump did in his proclamation––is a good start. But the proof of this administration’s commitment will depend upon the policies it proposes and implements. Those policies must face the facts about our changing climate, and prepare our vital infrastructure for a warmer, wilder future. 
Share

Related Articles

FHWA Solicits Applications for $2.4B in Bridge Project Funding

FHWA Solicits Applications for $2.4B in Bridge Project Funding

This morning, the Federal Highway Administration opened the process of giving out the first $2.36 billion of a five-year, $12+ billion...

Bridge Collapse Revives Criticism Over Using Road Dollars for Police

Bridge Collapse Revives Criticism Over Using Road Dollars for Police

Jeff Davis, a senior fellow with the Eno Center for Transportation and the editor of the Eno Transportation Weekly, said that...

FHWA Gives States $5.3 Billion in Bridge Funding

FHWA Gives States $5.3 Billion in Bridge Funding

The Federal Highway Administration today gave state DOTs $5.3 billion in new funding specifically to repair and improve highway bridges,...

Biden Plan Funds New Bridges That Locals May Not Want

Biden Plan Funds New Bridges That Locals May Not Want

“The bigger you get, whether it’s a bridge or a tunnel, the more trouble you’re going to get,” said Jeff Davis, a senior fellow at...

Can Biden build a bridge to fix America's infrastructure problems?

Can Biden build a bridge to fix America's infrastructure problems?

Designed to support state-level transportation projects, Paul Lewis, vice president of policy at Eno Center for Transportation, said states...

The repair of a vital Memphis bridge could take 2 months, chief engineer says. The impacts are already being felt

The repair of a vital Memphis bridge could take 2 months, chief engineer says. The impacts are already being felt

"A bridge like this could likely qualify, but it's hard to say what the metrics will be," said Paul Lewis, vice president of policy and...

Can Congress fix I-80? How Biden’s expected infrastructure plan could impact Sacramento

Can Congress fix I-80? How Biden’s expected infrastructure plan could impact Sacramento

Saying a bridge is deficient “doesn’t mean the bridge is about to fall down. That kind of thing is very rare. Things that engineers do...

Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

Op-Ed: The Infrastructure Disaster Nobody is Talking About

Perhaps we are still distracted by the election. Perhaps commuting patterns have changed so much that it is not as important. But unless...

Rapid Response Webinar: The House Surface Transportation Bill: Initial Overview

Rapid Response Webinar: The House Surface Transportation Bill: Initial Overview

Eno’s Jeff Davis summarizes the funding levels and major programmatic changes under the $490 billion surface transportation authorization...

FHWA Gives Out $2B in FY20 General Fund Highway Formula Funding

FHWA Gives Out $2B in FY20 General Fund Highway Formula Funding

The Federal Highway Administration has apportioned to states the $2 billion in additional highway formula funding from general revenues...

Performance Goals Force Some States to Prioritize NHS Bridges, Interstate Maintenance

Performance Goals Force Some States to Prioritize NHS Bridges, Interstate Maintenance

As the Eno Center's recent study, Refreshing the Status Quo: Federal Highway Programs and Funding Distribution pointed out, at present, the...

DOT Gives $225M in Grants for One-Off Discretionary Bridge Program

DOT Gives $225M in Grants for One-Off Discretionary Bridge Program

The U.S. Department of Transportation on August 29 announced that 20 highway bridge replacement projects would split $225 million in grant...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks