Guest Op-Ed: Don’t Be Fooled; Same-Day Delivery Isn’t Really Free

Guest Op-Ed: Don’t Be Fooled; Same-Day Delivery Isn’t Really Free

February 14, 2020  | Allan Rutter, Senior Research Scientist, Texas A&M Transportation Institute

50 years ago, when normal people could change their own oil, a mechanic in a television advertisement counseled that replacing the oil filter as part of a regular oil change was a sound investment, “You can pay me now, or you can pay me later.”

This iconic slogan is appropriate for more than car maintenance; it also applies when we look at shopping and delivery trends today.

A new analysis by the World Economic Forum reports that demand for near-instant e-commerce deliveries will increase traffic in major cities over the next decade, boosting tailpipe emissions by 30 percent and expanding traffic delays by 21 percent. This results from an estimated 36 percent growth in delivery vehicles by 2030 to meet urban consumer expectations.

This is a classic good news / bad news picture. Frenetic growth in deliveries means a strong economy, great for employment and consumer confidence. The downside comes as vehicles with all our stuff compound the burdensome travel delays detailed in the 2019 Urban Mobility Report from my colleagues at the Texas A&M Transportation Institute. This unsustainable trend is fueled by how we think about free delivery.

Let’s consider the influence of changing customer expectations. According to a survey by the industry research firm Invesp, 80 percent of shoppers want same-day shipping and 61 percent want their packages within hours of placing an order. The top two reasons for customers choosing same-day delivery: first, they needed the order immediately (50 percent) and second, it was free (29 percent).

So, 29 percent of online shoppers want their stuff right away not because they need it immediately, but simply because they’re not paying extra for it. Let’s consider the applicability of the word “free” in this instance.

The World Economic Forum’s research reveals the costs involved; worsening urban gridlock steals our time and increased emissions threaten our health. The new report also suggests that there’s cause for cautious optimism in the range of possible solutions.

A switch to light and medium-duty electric delivery vehicles, for example, could reduce CO2 emissions. Hyundai and Kia are certainly serious about it, investing more than $100 million in a startup British manufacturer of electric delivery vans. Overall net urban emissions could decrease through a reduction in both mobile sources (fewer diesel-powered vehicles) and emissions from electric generation plants that drift into our neighborhoods (these plants are shifting from coal to cleaner, cheaper natural gas).

Delivery companies could also use dynamic routing software to reduce the mileage and time needed by delivery drivers (and, eventually, robots). And there’s the prospect of using drones, of course.

Give the World Economic Forum credit for suggesting remedies along with their gloomy predictions of gridlock and dirty air. But let’s consider what’s also driving this increase in delivery vehicles.

For much of this old guy’s lifetime, the fastest way to acquire a product –a TV set, a pair of boots, or an economy-size bundle of paper towels – involved visiting a store; getting something delivered meant waiting for weeks. Scrappy retailers and impatient consumers have been steadily chipping away at the differences separating online and brick-and-mortar retail.

Online sales recently jumped to another record-setting share of the 2019 holiday shopping season, generating rippling waves of rapid deliveries (not to mention the stuff we sent back to retailers under no-charge return policies). That may have helped many of us get our gifts but how often did we consider that our rush hours were being rattled by vehicles coming and going from e-commerce distribution centers to bring us our own stuff?

Next-day and same-day delivery aren’t really free, are they? Every box arriving at our front door is tethered to incremental costs to our infrastructure and environment. These are costs we’ll have to pay eventually; the real questions are when, how, and how much. Perhaps as online retailers struggle with higher costs of order fulfillment and logistics, they might consider small premiums for same day deliveries or add incentives for two- to three-day shipping.

With this broader understanding, the next time the finger of this transportation wonk hovers over the same day delivery button for my online purchase, I might stop and consider a hard-earned life lesson, that just because I can do something doesn’t mean that I should do it. How much do I really need that quick delivery? There are times when the fate of our household absolutely requires instant delivery of specialty-sized, heavy-duty litter box liners. Restocking the shelves with paper towels? That can probably wait.


Allan Rutter heads the Freight and Investment Analysis Division at the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI), and he is a former Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration.

The views expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Eno Center for Transportation.

Share

Related Articles

Webinar Recap: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

Webinar Recap: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

The coronavirus pandemic has hammered state and municipal budgets across the United States. A recent analysis from the National League of...

Jeff Davis Presentation on Eisenhower and Transportation

Jeff Davis Presentation on Eisenhower and Transportation

This is a PDF of the PowerPoint presentation that Eno's Jeff Davis gave at the Capitol Historical Society Heritage Lecture on September 14,...

1956 Treasury Secretary Letter to Harry Byrd on Pay-As-You-Build Highways

1956 Treasury Secretary Letter to Harry Byrd on Pay-As-You-Build Highways

This PDF is a copy of a letter from Treasury Secretary George Humphrey to Senate Finance Committee chairman Harry Byrd (D-VA), dated March...

The St. Lawrence Seaway and Federal Maritime Policy Under President Eisenhower

The St. Lawrence Seaway and Federal Maritime Policy Under President Eisenhower

(Clicking on hyperlinks in the text will take you to original source documents, many of which are from the Eisenhower Library or other...

1955

1955 "Weeks Report" - Revision of Federal Transportation Policy

This is the version of the "Weeks Report" of the President's Advisory Committee on Transport Policy and Organization, as released to the...

Cabinet Meeting of January 28, 1955

Cabinet Meeting of January 28, 1955

This 12-page PDF document contains three items relating to the Cabinet Meeting of January 28, 1955: Cabinet Paper 6/1, dated January...

December 1954 Cabinet Meeting on Railroad Policy

December 1954 Cabinet Meeting on Railroad Policy

This is a 39-page PDF file relating to the Cabinet meeting of December 17, 1954 where the initial draft of the "Weeks Report" (the report...

1958 Eisenhower Administration Statement of Railroad Policy

1958 Eisenhower Administration Statement of Railroad Policy

This is a PDF file of the records of the Cabinet meeting of March 28, 1958 and its results. The 33-page PDF contains copies of the...

Webinar: Promoting Resiliency Across the Global Supply Chains

Webinar: Promoting Resiliency Across the Global Supply Chains

Supply chain and logistics professionals are constantly adapting to technological and socioeconomic shifts in the mobility landscape. While...

Senate Passes Pipeline Safety Reauthorization Bill

Senate Passes Pipeline Safety Reauthorization Bill

Last night, the U.S. Senate quietly passed a three-year pipeline safety reauthorization bill (S. 2299) by unanimous consent, without...

House Passes Biennial Water Resources Bill

House Passes Biennial Water Resources Bill

The House of Representatives passed the biennial water resources development bill (H.R. 7575) this week by voice vote after perfunctory...

House Adds Coast Guard, Maritime Bills to Defense Authorization

House Adds Coast Guard, Maritime Bills to Defense Authorization

On July 21, the House of Representatives passed a $734 billion defense authorization bill for fiscal year 2021, after amending the bill...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks