Gov. Cuomo’s Congestion Pricing Proposal for New York City

Gov. Cuomo’s Congestion Pricing Proposal for New York City

March 15, 2018  | Shannon Walsh

March 15, 2018

New York City is proposing to deal with two concurrent transportation problems using one solution. Its traffic congestion ranks third worst in the world and traffic moves a record-low speed of 4.7 mph during peak travel. The main alternative to driving, the subway system, is suffering major delays due to deferred maintenance. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) estimates that they will need approximately $836 million to begin addressing the needs of the subway system. Governor Chris Cuomo called a state of emergency in the subways last June, and began investigating new funding options to tackle the issue. His 15-person task force, “Fix NYC,”

Specifically, the proposal would charge vehicles that enter the most congested part of New York at the busiest times, with the dual goal of deterring people from commuting via car and raising revenue for other forms of travel. The cordon would consist of the central business district of Manhattan, which covers everything south of 60th Street, and would apply during weekdays between the hours of 6 am and 8 pm. While some existing bridges and tunnels to Manhattan already charge cars up to $12.50, the new cordon scheme would charge all vehicles this price, regardless of whether or not they come from across a river. New York residents living inside the designated cordon would not be exempt from paying the fee. All ride-for-hire trips, from Uber to traditional taxis, would be exempt from the cordon charge but would have to pay a $2.00 to $5.00 per ride fee that would vary depending on the time, location within the cordon, and day of week.

The new charges would bring in serious revenue. Fix NYC estimates pricing would bring the city annual gross revenues of $705 million from cars, $105 million from commercial vehicles, and $690 million from ride-for-hire fees for a total of $1.5 billion annually. But the program would not be implemented overnight. The draft proposal would roll out in three phases, to be completed by 2020.

Phase 1 explains that, “before asking commuters to abandon their cars, we must first improve transit capacity and reliability.” This includes identifying and improving current issues in New York’s transportation system, specifically the subway. Other portions of Phase 1 include enforcing and reforming current regulations in the central business district, which is the target market for congestion pricing. Target regulations for reform and enforcement include bus lanes and NYC placard laws. Phase 2 outlines the introduction of surcharges, beginning with ride-for-hire vehicles. Phase 3, the final phase, outlines the implementation of truck and car pricing. The report suggests possible expansion in the future if the program is successful, such as weekends between 11 am and 9 pm.

If implemented, New York would join three international cities, London, Singapore, and Stockholm, which have comparable programs. In London, drivers are charged 11.50 pounds ($15.96 USD) per day to enter the designated cordon between 7 am and 6 pm Monday through Friday. Even with the exclusion of fees on major holidays, London saw 200 million pounds ($277.5 million USD) in revenue in 2013 used for investments in their public transportation. Singapore has had it’s modern form of cordon pricing since 1998 with the current system charging drivers up to $2.00 USD between 7 am and 7 pm on main roads depending on the car, time of day, and location within the central business district to which they enter. Their system is adjusted every calendar quarter to reach what is called “golden range,” or traffic flowing at between 20-30 kilometers per hour on main streets. Their program enabled a 24% reduction in weekday traffic upon implementation and annual revenues of approximately $150 million USD.

Stockholm implemented a comparable congestion-charging program in 2006, charging ranging prices from $1.33 USD to $2.67 USD to vehicles entering the central business district between the hours of 6:30 am to 6:30 pm, with a maximum of three charges per day. Unlike Cuomo’s proposal , taxis are exempt from their charge. Congestion dropped in the city by 25% upon implementation and the city sees annual revenue of approximately $100 million USD.

The cordon-charging proposal is far from complete, as major political hurdles remain. Fix NYC was the Governor’s proposal, and conspicuously did not include anyone from New York City Mayor de Blasio’s office. De Blasio is vehemently against the proposal, arguing that such programs will disproportionately affect the lower and middle class citizens that commute into the central business district from the outer boroughs, many of whom do not live near a public transportation option. Opponents of the legislation argue that the tax will equate to over $1,000 per year.

Instead, Mayor de Blasio proposes implementing a “Millionaire Tax” to fund subway improvements. Others in opposition to the fee suggest removing bike lanes in the highest trafficked areas of Manhattan by car or reducing fares on the Long Island Railroad, serves much of the car commuters in Queens.

However, only 4% of the commuters traveling into the central business district would be subject to the fee in a recent study done by the Community Service Society (CSS). Only 2% of what the CSS considers to be “working poor” are subject to the fee, all others work outside the cordon or commute in other ways. And de Blasio’s millionaire tax would net between $700 and $800 million for the city, far less than the $1.5 billion per year than Cuomo’s program.

De Blasio’s opposition might not matter much. For Cuomo’s proposal to be implemented, it needs to be approved by the State Legislature, bypassing the Mayor’s office. The proposal was received in the legislature in late January, but the current priority in New York is the passage of new budget legislation by April 1. Regardless of when or if the Legislature takes up the proposal, cordon pricing in New York would transform the transportation landscape.

Share

Related Articles

Congestion pricing can be equitable, if done right

Congestion pricing can be equitable, if done right

“Singapore, London, and Stockholm each saw drops in vehicle emissions after congestion pricing was introduced”—in these cases, the...

Wheels of Fortune: A Centennial Institute Recap

Wheels of Fortune: A Centennial Institute Recap

While reforming surface transportation funding and financing is an evergreen topic in federal Washington, major events over the last two...

How Could USDOT Organize Around Climate Under Biden?

How Could USDOT Organize Around Climate Under Biden?

President-elect Joe Biden has indicated that climate change will be one of the biggest, if not the absolute biggest, focus of his...

Webinar Recap: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

Webinar Recap: Transportation Spending and Planning in the Time of COVID

The coronavirus pandemic has hammered state and municipal budgets across the United States. A recent analysis from the National League of...

Webinar: A Century of Fighting Traffic Congestion in Los Angeles

Webinar: A Century of Fighting Traffic Congestion in Los Angeles

The Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro) is studying congestion pricing to manage the region’s heavy traffic and...

Recap of Eno Webinar on Equity in Congestion Pricing

Recap of Eno Webinar on Equity in Congestion Pricing

In August, Eno hosted a webinar titled Congestion Pricing’s Role in Building More Equitable Transportation Systems. The webinar was a...

Road to Recovery Webinar: Rebalancing the Load: How Road User Charging Can Influence Traveler Behavior

Road to Recovery Webinar: Rebalancing the Load: How Road User Charging Can Influence Traveler Behavior

Congestion pricing can be a valuable tool for regions to address congestion and meet goals for sustainability and equity. Intelligent...

Webinar: Congestion Pricing’s Role in Building More Equitable Transportation Systems

Webinar: Congestion Pricing’s Role in Building More Equitable Transportation Systems

Congestion pricing is an idea that has broad support from transportation practitioners. However, many elected officials and members of the...

House INVEST Act Includes Congestion Pricing Provisions

House INVEST Act Includes Congestion Pricing Provisions

The House's surface transportation reauthorization bill, titled the INVEST in America Act, was introduced last week by the chairman of the...

Road to Recovery Webinar: Jennifer Aument

Road to Recovery Webinar: Jennifer Aument

Jennifer Aument leads the development and operations of major toll roads in North America on behalf of Transurban – one of the largest...

Op-Ed: Now is The Right Moment to Address Transportation-Related Air Quality Concerns

Op-Ed: Now is The Right Moment to Address Transportation-Related Air Quality Concerns

Vehicle miles traveled have plummeted across the country with many pre-COVID drivers now working from home (see FHWA’s April 2020 Traffic...

Congestion Pricing Can Be Built For Equity

Congestion Pricing Can Be Built For Equity

Streetsblog reports on Eno's Congestion Pricing report, authored by Brianne Eby, Robert Puentes, and Martha Roskowski.

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks