Debate on Transit Subsidies Prompts More Agreement than Expected

Debate on Transit Subsidies Prompts More Agreement than Expected

October 05, 2018  | Alice Grossman

October 5, 2018

New technologies are emerging that have the potential to change Americans’ travel patterns. On October 2, the Cato institute hosted transit network design expert Jarrett Walker, of Jarrett Walker + Associates and Cato’s own transportation thinker, Randall O’Toole. The two discussed the past, present, and future of public transportation in the United States, agreeing on many issues such as the importance of freedom of mobility, benefits of private investment, and the disparity between transit needs in urban, suburban, and rural areas. While O’Toole focused on national ridership trends and connections between land use and transportation, Walker denounced the usefulness of nationally aggregated transit data and focused on the importance of local context.

The effect of land use on transportation (and vice versa) is long studied and as suburban centers have sprung up in the second half of the twentieth century creating multiple nuclei structures, commute, shopping, and other travel patterns have become ore complex than simple in and out of a central downtown area. Public transit ridership has steadily dropped in most major US cities over the last few years as transit agencies aim to provide service with adequate coverage and compete with new mobility options like transportation network companies (TNCs).

The goals that transit agencies set reflect on their priorities. Public transit agencies often work towards providing access within a region to all people, sometimes focusing more on non-vehicles owners, and sometimes focusing on getting people out of their cars and onto transit. Private providers may also have the goal of making money. As Walker noted at the beginning of his presentation, no transit agency has the sole goal of increasing ridership, and the goals of each agency depend on the local political, economic, and social fabric.

While both speakers emphasized the importance of providing freedom of mobility, neither used the term “equity” during the entire presentation or following Q & A. Walker stressed the importance of coverage in low ridership areas, a provision often associated with meeting equity goals, while O’Toole saw low-demand routes as an indication that the service did not provide enough benefit to be worth the cost. Allowing the market to determine service availability and prices without accountability could exclude users based on location or wealth level, though may maximize fiscal returns.

To some degree, one’s choice in commuting mode can be a result of one’s choice in land use – or vice versa. Dense cities like New York and San Francisco show the desirability for dense, mononucleic urban structure, while expanding suburbs and exurbs show the desire for affordable private land ownership. The speakers each interpreted the market differently, Walker pulling for a focus on urban growth and form to support land use compatible with traditional bus and rail service, and O’Toole painting an ideal of suburban quilting across the country with private automated vehicles filling additional mobility needs.

A break-even or profitable business model is necessary in the case of non-subsidized service. While both Walker and O’Toole agreed that private companies could provide quality service, history shows that privately operated transit systems usually needed operating subsidies from somewhere (not from government, necessarily, but as a loss leader from some other private enterprise). The robust privately-owned streetcar systems of the 1930s and 40s were largely subsidized by electric utilities or suburban real estate developers, but when the electric grid was fully connected and the new suburbs fully developed, the subsidies stopped, to be replaced by the taxpayer-funded agencies running buses and trains today. Experiments with microtransit and the high level of venture capital subsidizing TNC rides suggest that even in the twenty first century, money-making public transportation applications are few and far between.

The full discussion can be viewed as a video or downloaded as a podcast here.

Share

Related Articles

Guest Op-Ed: America Needs to Invest in Universal Road User Education

Guest Op-Ed: America Needs to Invest in Universal Road User Education

As we continue to grapple with the COVID-19 pandemic and over 800,000 lives lost in the U.S., the number of road user deaths could easily...

Guest Op-Ed: Alternative Traffic Enforcement to Re-Center Road Safety

Guest Op-Ed: Alternative Traffic Enforcement to Re-Center Road Safety

Transportation has become the most policed aspect of daily life in the United States. The most frequent interactions between police and...

Centennial Anthology: A Collection of Essays and Ideas

Centennial Anthology: A Collection of Essays and Ideas

Coming Out of the Crisis: A Look Past the Pandemic  The pandemic isn’t quite behind us, but every day the contours of the new normal...

Guest Op-Ed: Fairer Fares, Increased Ridership: Using Reduced Fare Programs as a Tool for Equitable Recovery

Guest Op-Ed: Fairer Fares, Increased Ridership: Using Reduced Fare Programs as a Tool for Equitable Recovery

In March 2020, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a few civic-minded New York City residents created CoronaMetro, a platform for...

“What Does Equity in Transportation Actually Mean?” Centennial Recap

“What Does Equity in Transportation Actually Mean?” Centennial Recap

Over the last two years of the pandemic, millions of essential workers, long identified as those most vulnerable during the pandemic, had...

Albuquerque’s bus system starts zero-fare experiment for 2022

Albuquerque’s bus system starts zero-fare experiment for 2022

More American cities are thinking about their transit systems that way, according to Robert Puentes, who heads up the ENO Center for...

How the House spending bill funds additional infrastructure

How the House spending bill funds additional infrastructure

The five years of funding in the infrastructure law, as tallied by Jeff Davis, would flow to states and be shaped by local needs, bringing...

Infrastructure Act Focus Shifts to Rolling Out the Funds

Infrastructure Act Focus Shifts to Rolling Out the Funds

Jeff Davis, Eno Center for Transportation senior fellow, says that $59 billion in apportioned 2022 highway funding—up $13.8 billion, or...

State and Local Traffic Enforcement Reforms Gain Traction

State and Local Traffic Enforcement Reforms Gain Traction

In the wake of the national reckoning with racial injustice and policing, states and cities began re-evaluating their approach to public...

Definition of

Definition of "Equity" Elusive at Senate Hearing

The buzzword "equity" is all over President Biden's American Jobs Plan, used in that context to refer to fair transportation outcomes...

Eno Releases New Mobility on Demand Reports with Data Insights and Recommendations

Eno Releases New Mobility on Demand Reports with Data Insights and Recommendations

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, public transit in the United States was going through a very dynamic period. The FTA's MOD Sandbox...

Webinar: Lessons Learned from the Mobility on Demand Pilots in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions

Webinar: Lessons Learned from the Mobility on Demand Pilots in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, King County Metro, and Sound Transit have been piloting mobility on demand (MOD)...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks