50 Years Ago Today: The First Transportation Appropriations Act

50 Years Ago Today: The First Transportation Appropriations Act

October 17, 2017  | Jeff Davis

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Fifty years ago today, on October 17, 1967, the House of Representatives passed the conference report on the first Department of Transportation Appropriations Act by a vote of 368 to 22. The following day, the Senate passed the conference report by voice vote.

Creation of a new Cabinet-level Department of Transportation had been authorized by the enactment of a law in October 1966 (see our extensive DOT creation document collection here) and the new Department had a start date of April 1, 1967. The initial financial needs of the Department were met with the funding balances carried over by its various component parts, but a full budget was required for the fiscal year starting on July 1, 1967. The Appropriations Committees even gave the new Department its own appropriations subcommittee, which meant it would have its own appropriations bill all to itself.

But a stopgap continuing resolution was needed from the outset – the House Appropriations Committee didn’t even report the transportation bill (H.R. 11456, 90th Congress) until July 13, almost two weeks into the fiscal year. The House passed the bill on July 18 by a vote of 393 to 5, and the Senate passed its amended version on October 5 by a vote of 71 to 1. After a short House-Senate conference, a conference report (H. Rept. 768, 90th Congress) was filed on October 12.

The conference agreement appropriated $1.582 billion from the general fund of the Treasury for the new Department and also provided $3.771 billion in liquidating cash from the Highway Trust Fund to pay off that year’s contract authority from the Trust Fund for the Federal Highway Administration. The general fund appropriation was $137 million, or 8 percent, below the Johnson Administration’s first budget request.

How much money would that be today? It’s hard to make a Department-wide comparison, since the FY 1968 USDOT contained the Coast Guard but did not have to fund mass transit (which was still at HUD), or Amtrak (which did not yet exist), or maritime (the House actually debated a bill to create an independent maritime agency immediately after debating the USDOT appropriations conference report). But looking at a bureau and account basis for things that were in USDOT fifty years ago that are still in USDOT today, one can easily use the official inflation calculator on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website to compare how much dollars in October 1967 would be worth today, then compare them to how much Congress is considering spending on those same accounts in the pending FY 2018 budget cycle.

USDOT Appropriations: 1968 Versus 2018

(Millions of dollars)
FY 1968 FY 1968 Plus FY 2018
Appropriation Inflation* Request
OST Salaries and Expenses 7 54 112
FAA Operations 605 4,431 9,891
FAA Facilities & Equipment 54 396 2,766
FAA R E & D 27 198 150
FAA Airport Grants 70 513 3,350
FHWA Federal-aid Highways 3,771 27,619 44,973
FRA Bureau total (excl. Amtrak) 16 118 289
*Inflation calculated using the Bureau of Labor Statistics online Inflation Calculator (CPI-U), October 1967 to September 2017.

CPI is an imperfect measure of inflation, particularly for capital programs, but it is the most commonly used metric, and by that measure, Congress is spending almost two-thirds more on highways today than it did in 1968 (which was near the peak of the building of the Interstate System). And spending on air traffic control today dwarfs the spending levels of fifty years ago (the creation of the user-tax-supported Airport and Airway Trust Fund in 1970 gave a significant boost to FAA spending). Notably, Congress doubled the spending on FAA Facilities and Equipment from the Administration’s budget request.

If one goes back and reads the debate on that first USDOT spending bill, the really remarkable thing is a program that is now mostly forgotten. The 1968 act provided $142.4 million – which would be over $1 billion in today’s dollars – through the FAA for research, development, and prototype testing of a civilian supersonic jet airliner to compete with the British-French Concorde and the Soviet Tupolev TU-144. The SST program had been a top priority of President Kennedy (though his brother Bobby spoke against the SST program in Senate floor debate).

More than half of the floor debate on the entire bill (much, much more than half, in the Senate’s case) was just about the SST program. In both cases, the chambers voted down amendments to kill the SST program (the House amendment was defeated, 30 yeas to 89 nays, and the Senate amendment fell, 19 years to 54 nays). Congress would later kill the SST program after much drama late in FY 1971. It would have been the Boeing 2707.

President Johnson would sign the bill into law on October 23, on his Budget Director’s recommendation.

Full documentation on the FY 1968 USDOT appropriations act, to the extent it is available online for free and not part of a library subscription service, is here:

Share

Related Articles

Emission-Reducing Aviation Technologies Presented at House Hearing

Emission-Reducing Aviation Technologies Presented at House Hearing

This week, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s Subcommittee on Aviation met to discuss different aviation...

Webinar: Eyes in the Skies: How The Ukrainian Crisis Affects Aviation

Webinar: Eyes in the Skies: How The Ukrainian Crisis Affects Aviation

The war in Ukraine has touched almost every corner of the world in almost as many ways. From parts availability to rising oil prices, it's...

Centennial Anthology: A Collection of Essays and Ideas

Centennial Anthology: A Collection of Essays and Ideas

Coming Out of the Crisis: A Look Past the Pandemic  The pandemic isn’t quite behind us, but every day the contours of the new normal...

Senate Hearing Brings Airlines, Payroll Support Program, Workforce into Focus

Senate Hearing Brings Airlines, Payroll Support Program, Workforce into Focus

Every few years Congress brings together all the major airline CEOs to press them on major concerns and pet issues. The most recent...

Looking to the Skies: A Centennial Institute Session Recap

Looking to the Skies: A Centennial Institute Session Recap

If there was one word to describe the state of the U.S. aviation industry in 2019, it was “soaring.” Airlines in the United States...

Op-Ed: Incorporating Sustainability in Airport Planning

Op-Ed: Incorporating Sustainability in Airport Planning

Airports are a critical part of the U.S. transportation infrastructure as they play a key role in the economy and in connecting passengers...

Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill: Airports and Ports/Waterways

Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill: Airports and Ports/Waterways

There were many areas of infrastructure (to say nothing of non-physical "infrastructure") where the members of the bipartisan Senate...

Modernizing Airports and Air Traffic Control Facilities Among Top Priorities in Aviation Infrastructure Funding

Modernizing Airports and Air Traffic Control Facilities Among Top Priorities in Aviation Infrastructure Funding

The Subcommittee on Aviation Safety, Operations, and Innovation of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation held a...

Guest Op-Ed: Action and Reaction: The Belarus Gambit to Force Diversion of Ryanair Flight 4978

Guest Op-Ed: Action and Reaction: The Belarus Gambit to Force Diversion of Ryanair Flight 4978

Before the end of World War II, the United States government brought representatives of nations from around the world to Chicago to hammer...

Here’s how the GOP infrastructure plan stacks up against Biden’s transportation plans

Here’s how the GOP infrastructure plan stacks up against Biden’s transportation plans

Jeff Davis examined what Biden and Senate Republicans are proposing to spend on roads, transit, rail, airports and safety programs over...

State of the Aviation Industry Hearing

State of the Aviation Industry Hearing

In a hearing on April 21, the Senate Subcommittee on Aviation, Safety, Operations, and Innovation assessed the state of the aviation...

An Update on the Precarious State of the Aviation Industry

An Update on the Precarious State of the Aviation Industry

COVID-19 has landed the aviation industry in the largest crisis in its history. With the pandemic still ongoing and passengers levels still...

Be Part of the Conversation
Sign up to receive news, events, publications, and course notifications.
No thanks